A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Dimanche general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : some sharp depictions of family and class, but too much that remains fairly sketchy See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Dimanche collects ten stories that Irène Némirovsky wrote between 1934 and 1941.
Her tragic life-story and surprising posthumous revival and success (with Suite française) are perhaps so familiar (and certainly rehashed in practically every review of any of her works) that it might seem to obviate the need for any introduction or notes, but Dimanche could have done with a bit more than the copy on the back cover.
(Matters are not helped when one finds there the claim that these stories were: "Written between 1934 and 1942" -- surprising, given that the latest any of these stories was originally published was in 1941.)
While the publishers made the interesting decision to leave the story-titles in French (with the corresponding English in brackets)
-- and used that of the title-story for the title of the collection as a whole, despite the fact that there is an exact English equivalent -- they fail to provide even something as basic as the original dates of publication of the stories, or, absent that, to even note that the stories are presented chronologically (which readers will presumably suspect, but can't be sure of without further research).
Alain was looking for insurance against the future. Now that he was middle-aged, by performing his filial duty he was doing his best to buy for himself the certainty of growing old surrounded by his own flesh and blood, and by young people's voices, which would block out the sound of approaching death.These are stories full of failed loves: husbands who don't care all that much for their wives, parents (especially mothers) who believe they love their children, yet can't help but constantly be critical of them. There are the usual marital betrayals, but there are also many betrayals of children. Typically, a young girl asks: "You'll never leave, will you, Clémence ?"So much for that childhood, one imagines ... but Némirovsky rarely dwells on what happens to these children, concentrating on the selfish adults and their self-serving actions. There's some astonishing self-loathing here, too, of little girls who were never good enough for their mothers all grown up. 'The confidante' is typical: I was becoming ambitious for myself, particularly when I passed an examination with excellent marks. But then I'd say to myself, 'With the ugly face God has given you, my girl, you must ask for nothing, hope for nothing. It's for the best; at least you'll spare yourself the cruelty of disappointments.'So many of her characters also show an incapacity for love: "She didn't know how to love" is what it often comes down to -- though the characters often have to practically contort themselves to avoid it: " Well, I don't love her," said Alain in despair. "It's not my fault. Love doesn't beget love, or, ta least, and that's what's so terrible, it only induces an illusion, and ersatz love."One story, 'Brotherhood', features a typical Némirovsky protagonist, off to meet some high-society friends at a château but stuck in the middle of nowhere -- and forced to confront some truths about himself. Here Christian (sic !) Rabinovitch, a secular Jew, meets "a badly dressed, thin, ill-shaven man with dirty hands" looking after a sickly child while waiting for the train. The man's name is also Rabinovitch, and represents everything that Christian wants to have left behind of himself. And Christian tries to convince himself he has nothing in common with this Jew: "By education and by culture I'm closer to a man like Sestres; in my habits, my tastes, my way of life, I'm much further away from that Jew than I am from an oriental peddler. Three, or even four, generations have elapsed. I'm a different man, not just spiritually, but physically as well. My nose and mouth don't matter, they are nothing. Only the soul matters!"Such ruthless depictions of men (and women, and mothers and daughters) and their delusions are where Némirovsky is at her best. Unfortunately, she rarely has -- or at least takes -- the space to fully delve into these damaged psyches here. Fascinating, too, are aspects of the stories written under the German occupation, including 'The spectator', in which the protagonist, Hugo, finds a Europe being overrun by Hitler's troops "has the charm of those who are going to die". He is also tempted to linger in Paris longer than is safe because he thinks: Yet how interesting it would have been to see the beginning of this war ! What would everyone feel ? How shaken they would be ? What would come of this terrible crisis ? Heroism ? A longing for pleasure ? Hatred ? And how would it manifest itself ? Would men become better ? More intelligent ? Or worse ? It was fascinating, all this, fascinating !It is these final stories that are most interesting with respect to Némirovsky's own fate, suggesting how she approached these terrible, inescapable events as a writer. Dimanche is a decent collection of stories, with a few that stand very well on their own. On the whole, however, it does not compare to her longer fiction -- Suite française, in particular -- and the collection is of greatest interest for the light it sheds on Némirovsky herself (and Némirovsky-as-writer) -- and thus it is all the more disappointing that the volume comes with absolutely no supporting material that might help a reader navigate this territory. - M.A.Orthofer, 1 June 2010 - Return to top of the page - Dimanche:
- Return to top of the page - Irène Némirovsky was born in Russia in 1903. Her family moved to France, where she became a successful and popular author in the 1930s. She died in Auschwitz in 1942. - Return to top of the page -
© 2010-2021 the complete review
|