A
Literary Saloon
&
Site of Review.

Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.



Contents:
Main
the Best
the Rest
Review Index
Links

weblog

crQ

RSS

to e-mail us:


support the site



In Association with Amazon.com


In association with Amazon.com - UK


In association with Amazon.ca - Canada


In 
Partnerschaft 
mit 
Amazon.de


En 
partenariat 
avec 
amazon.fr


In association with Amazon.it - Italia

the Complete Review
the complete review - fiction

     

Anatomy. Monotony.

by
Edy Poppy


general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author

To purchase Anatomy. Monotony.



Title: Anatomy. Monotony.
Author: Edy Poppy
Genre: Novel
Written: 2005 (Eng. 2018)
Length: 335 pages
Original in: Norwegian
Availability: Anatomy. Monotony. - US
Anatomy. Monotony. - UK
Anatomy. Monotony. - Canada
Die Hände des Cellisten - Deutschland
Anatomy. Monotony. - Italia
  • Norwegian title: Anatomi. Monotoni.
  • Translated by May-Brit Akerholt

- Return to top of the page -



Our Assessment:

B- : too personal, too forced

See our review for fuller assessment.




Review Summaries
Source Rating Date Reviewer
Aftenposten . 31/10/2005 A.M.K.Prinos
TLS . 14/9/2018 Fríða Ísberg


  From the Reviews:
  • "Poppys debut er langt fra norsk hverdagskost. Den skriver seg inn i en fransk erotisk tradisjon, en genre som ikke akkurat dominerer her til lands, og har sider som kan minne om for eksempel Anaïs Nin. (...) Det boken står og faller på, er likevel selve fortellerstemmen. Og her synes jeg Poppy lykkes godt." - Anne Merethe K. Prinos, Aftenposten

  • "The fundamental question of Anatomy. Monotony. becomes clear: how to live with all kinds of unquenchable lusts when the unpredictable becomes predictable, when all excitement must, eventually, turn monotonous." - Fríða Ísberg, Times Literary Supplement

Please note that these ratings solely represent the complete review's biased interpretation and subjective opinion of the actual reviews and do not claim to accurately reflect or represent the views of the reviewers. Similarly the illustrative quotes chosen here are merely those the complete review subjectively believes represent the tenor and judgment of the review as a whole. We acknowledge (and remind and warn you) that they may, in fact, be entirely unrepresentative of the actual reviews by any other measure.

- Return to top of the page -



The complete review's Review:

       Anatomy. Monotony. is narrated by Vår, a Norwegian woman married to Frenchman Lou; they live together in London. Vår earns some money as an art model -- "I'm a popular nude model" -- but she is also exposing herself and putting herself on display in another way: she is trying to write an autobiographical book -- this book. Passages of the work-in-progress -- also titled: Anatomy. Monotony. -- are interspersed in the more direct first-person account that makes up most of Anatomy. Monotony., with the perspective (third, rather than first- person) and the names changed -- the Vår-figure called Ragnhild Moe (which is, in fact, the pseudonymous Edy Poppy's real name), her husband Cyril (which is Poppy/Moe's (ex-)husband's real name)).
       Early on, she's still struggling somewhat with the writing, unsure about how seriously to take it, but finding it a valuable outlet:

I'm lucky to have my art, my scribbling, so I have somewhere to put my feelings.
       Eventually, it takes on greater importance -- and when, in the last parts of the book, Vår and Lou move from London to her small hometown of Bø, she devotes herself completely to the writing. Throughout, the main issue she wrestles with is:
I wonder how I can change this very personal story into literature.
       The personal story involves the very open relationship she and her husband have. While in London, Lou is also involved with the (legal-but-still-)teen Sidney, while she is involved with men like The Lover and then a cellist, the American.
       The American eventually challenges her, suggesting:
     All that counts is Lou and you, isn't it ? The rest of us are just test rabbits, something you can write about ...
       She denies it, but doesn't sound convincing. Her motivation might be different -- possibly even sincere, on some level --, but she -- and her husband -- certainly come across as toying around with others in exploring just what their own relationship means and can withstand. Vår tells herself: "It is important to test one's limits, how far one can go" -- and she and Lou go pretty far. But it's obviously not the easiest balancing act, and part of the process is her trying to figure out just exactly what she needs and wants, something she continues to struggle with:
I have to separate sex from love. I want my husband to be the one to get both. I believe I don't need to love anyone else, that he can take care of that side, that as well as the intellectual. Because the only thing he needs help to is the erotic, orgies, men who take me from all sides and are sexually almost bestial. I think I should be satisfied with that, because I get more than most women. Of freedom.
       But freedom -- no limits -- can also be illusory. Lou's relationship with Sidney does bother her, and the other men in her life do get in the way of her relationship with him. They both want to see it as a sort of game, and Lou tries to convince himself, and her, that: "this time it will be different, I'll be stronger", but when she goes to Amsterdam to spend some time with the cellist, the strains show pretty clearly.
       The problem with the characters of Vår and Lou is, of course, that they come across as almost entirely vacuous, empty vessels seeking fulfillment -- and looking for guidance in all the wrong places:
     Lou insists that we still have much to learn, both of us, when it comes to crossing boundaries, bending them. He asks if I know the author Pauline Réage ?
       Of course the sheltered Norwegian girl doesn't, and even if she gamely immerses herself in Lou's authors -- "Réage, Bataille, Apollinaire, Breton, Aragon ..." -- both are emotionally incapable of doing much with these literary abstractions. And, honestly, even Vår's sleeping around is pretty tame -- not to mention Lou not being able to be any more adventurous than taking advantage of a wide-eyed teen.
       Vår has grand visions -- and it's telling that by the end she expresses them even more in literary terms (i.e. removed from the real), describing how she'd like her alter-ego fictional self (i.e. herself) to be:
I'm thinking about women in literature and wondering whom I like best. I love Lila in Lila Said, Catherine in The Garden of Eden, Hermine in Steppenwolf, and Velma in Velma Variations. That is the kind of woman I want Ragnhild to be: playful, different, amoral ... A woman Hamsun would like to dislike, I think, or Thomas Bernhard ... one of history's many ingenious male chauvinists. I want Ragnhild to be a woman who ridicules all men who are hostile to women.
       [Lila Said is surely Chimo's Lila dit ça, published in English as Lila Says.]
       Turning to writing, and trying to (re)define herself on the page, seems a slightly healthier way of going about it, as the testing of their relationship by involving others so intimately seems to have been a challenge which they weren't really equipped to handle, literarily or in real life. (It's hardly surprising to find that Poppy dedicates the book to her husband -- noting parenthetically there also: "He is now my ex-husband" ..... (Though, in fact, they seem to have maintained a relationship, even collaborating on his own debut novel.))
       Vår pondered: "I wonder how I can change this very personal story into literature", and this is certainly one way to try -- but Anatomy. Monotony. doesn't really go far enough, in any respect. While descriptive, it isn't raw -- the brutal honesty that might, perhaps, be revealing --, and the self-reflection remains fairly shallow. Occasionally, Vår seems to be on the verge of some insight, but fails to make the connections: she makes the claim: "The only way to get a feeling for a place is to experience it alone, I think, find one's own way, one's own tempo, one's on good and bad habits", but fails completely to project that go-it-alone approach to her inter-personal relationships.
       Presumably, Vår and Lou's (open-)marriage concept is meant to shock in its pseudo-daring, but it doesn't really seem very daring at all; rather Vår and Lou seem to be struggling desperately with coming to terms to with any sort of emotion and human connection, with each other or others. Not they don't have honest, deep feelings -- but they seem entirely dazed by them: when Vår says, early on: "I'm lucky to have my art, my scribbling, so I have somewhere to put my feelings" she's oblivious to what she's saying -- that the life she's leading doesn't allow her feelings expression anywhere else but in her 'scribblings'.
       It doesn't help the novel, as literary work, that the sex isn't very sexy, and the writing -- not helped by the translation -- ... struggles. Some of the simple descriptions show a writer trying way too hard:
I run through the city, my legs like the second hand on a watch, I don't stop until I'm home.
       Legs moving "like the second hand on a watch" ? Two legs, moving like a single second hand -- that, anchored in place at one end, ticks in a circular motion ?
       And some sentences beggar belief:
     With you, an orgasm is like a momentous upchuck of the finest food and drink.
       (Rather too lackadaisical editing also does the book no favors: see just some of the sentences quoted above, e.g.: "He asks if I know the author Pauline Réage ?" is not a proper sentence in English.)
       Anatomy. Monotony. comes across as a heartfelt attempt by a young woman to process, through writing, her juggling of unfulfilling yet passionate relationships -- trying, just a bit too hard, to be 'literary' and daring, and not quite equipped for the task at hand. The book is ultimately way too personal, tending towards too much idealized wishful projection -- a lover telling Vår: "You are violently, incredibly beautiful, and extremely tender" -- as Vår/Poppy/Moe can't achieve anywhere near the necessary distance from herself and her acts.

- M.A.Orthofer, 29 April 2018

- Return to top of the page -



Links:

Anatomy. Monotony.: Reviews: Other books of interest under review:

- Return to top of the page -



About the Author:

       Norwegian author Edy Poppy (Ragnhild Moe) was born in 1975.

- Return to top of the page -


© 2018 the complete review

Main | the New | the Best | the Rest | Review Index | Links