A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Beyond the Hoax general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
A- : solid arguments, all very well presented See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
In Beyond the Hoax Alan Sokal again returns to the notorious parody that started it all, Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity, first published in Social Text (Spring/Summer, 1996).
In Fashionable Nonsense (UK title: Intellectual Impostures) he, along with Jean Bricmont, had already dissected the piece (and the unfortunately very convincing nonsense it contained) and the sad state of affairs that made its publication possible, while the collection about The Sokal Hoax gave a very useful overview of the ensuing controversy and discussions.
What need then for another volume ?
that relativism and radical social constructivism have become hegemonic in vast areas of the humanities, anthropology and sociology of science (among other fields). In many intellectual circles nowadays, it is simply taken for granted that all facts are "socially constructed", scientific theories are mere "myths" or "narrations", scientific debates are resolved by "rhetoric" and "enlisting allies", and truth is a synonym for intersubjective agreement.It's hard not to think that Sokal is exaggerating here, and that the situation hasn't improved since the 'science wars' debate started, but some of the examples he gives suggest his warnings must still be heeded and the message is one well worth still pounding home. The chapter on 'Pseudoscience and postmodernism' is particularly disturbing, as he describes the medical/nursing theory of 'Therapeutic Touch' ("practiced in at least 80 hospitals across North America") as well as the fascinating and deeply troubling Hindu nationalist take on science in India (Sokal basing his discussion on Meera Nanda's Prophets Facing Backward: Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India). One essay, 'Religion, politics and survival', is a book review of Sam Harris' The End of Faith (and Michael Lerner's Spirit Matters) -- originally commissioned by Science & Society, it got a bit out of hand (at "seven times their maximum allowed length !") -- and this is the most important piece in the book, turning Sokal's arguments against another obvious target: religion. There's no way around it, after all: religions -- especially the major ones of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism -- are largely based on what is patently non-sense. Sokal allows that some of these beliefs are politically not that significant -- "When I run into Fundamentalists, I don't spend my time lecturing them on the Big Bang and evolution. I just nod and politely switch the subject" (though if it comes to debating teaching creationism in school he'd be more vociferous) -- but when they have the potential to affect our lives (and he's thinking of Islamic fundamentalism here in particular) then it gets more problematic. Aware of the social and political difficulties in dealing with such vast numbers of deluded folk, he nevertheless thinks straight talk -- rather than the usual indulgent relativism (mistakenly considered tolerance) -- is called for. The postmodernists seem to have been debunked, and the relativism he warns of doesn't seem quite as prevalent in the academy any longer (though there's a lot more that still needs to be beaten down), but the most fruitful and important area this fight should now focus on is, indeed, religion, and Sokal's piece on 'Religion, politics and survival' is a welcome addition to a discussion that too often is also sloppy in its presentation (and, occasionally, its thinking) -- witness The Case against Religion as poorly put by Christopher Hitchens in God is not Great. With the annotated version of his parody, essays dealing with various aspects of the Social Text-affair, and the important piece on 'Religion, politics and survival', Beyond the Hoax is both a useful and interesting collection. It must also be noted that Sokal has a very nice writing touch: yes, this book at times seems overwhelmed by footnotes, but it really is approachable, each annotation worth reading (and often chuckling over), his explanations and arguments clear and well presented, his thinking lucid. Much of this material is familiar (or seems to have been chewed over elsewhere quite a few times), but it's still all worth wading through again. An important book, and well worthwhile. - Return to top of the page - Beyond the Hoax:
- Return to top of the page - Alan Sokal was born in 1955 and is a professor of physics at NYU. - Return to top of the page -
© 2008-2011 the complete review
|