A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Tunnel general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : stylish but disturbingly twisted See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: In the opening paragraph of The Tunnel the narrator sums up the essentials: It should be sufficient to say that I am Juan Pablo Castel, the painter who killed María Irbane. I imagine that the trial is still in everyone's mind and that no further information about myself is necessary.It's a good tease: in fact, readers of course know nothing of these fictional characters or this trial. But admitting to murder is a good hook -- and Castel is only too happy to then provide further information about himself, and what led him to murder. Castel claims to have his own reasons for writing an account of what happened -- not for additional fame or notoriety, but rather in the: "faint hope that someone will understand me". María was -- or could have been -- such a person, he believes, but clearly that didn't work out, and in this account he tries to explain what went wrong. Castel first met María at an art exhibit, where he saw her lingering over one of his painting, Motherhood, lost in a scene in the corner of the painting (which he thinks: "suggested the most wistful and absolute loneliness") that everyone else seemed to overlook. Surrounded by friends, admirers, and critics who are largely or solely superficial, he sees in her instead a kindred spirit. Someone who gets it. Much later, she too confesses that the moment when she saw the painting sparked something in her: I sensed that we were alike, you and I, and that you, too, were searching blindly for someone, a kind of companion in silence. From that day I have thought of nothing but you.But if this is a tale of mutual obsession, Castel remains the active pursuer, repeatedly chasing her. And María tests the waters cautiously, often keeping her distance, even fleeing. Of course, her situation is more complicated. She's married -- to a blind man -- and it seems there have been, and are, other men in her life, too. Castel can't get over his suspicions and jealousy, the idealized María, meant to exist just for him, doesn't ..... The inevitable consequence is, of course, a violent crime of passion. Castel claims he is looking for understanding, a roundabout way of saying he wants someone to be convinced by his justifications and explanations. Cleverly, his account neither shies away from his frenzied obsession with María nor focuses solely on it. In often humorous scenes of vapid conversation and society-mingling, Castel leads readers through a vacuous culture that deserves his (and our, as he tries to make his reader complicit) contempt; one readily understands his frustration with the level of discourse and thought surrounding him. So too in the opening chapter he expresses not regret for what he did but rather that he didn't kill six or seven other people while he was at it ..... It is, of course, not a logical leap: the reasons -- if one can even call them that -- that he murders María are the familiar, basest ones. Dressed up, in a way, as yet another failure of someone to live up to his standards, it's not an excuse that will fly. Briefly, he saw her as a shining, fragile exception -- "an unreal child in a cruel world of ugliness and misery" -- but of course she couldn't live up to that idealized vision. And so he has to destroy her. It's an uncomfortable conclusion, not helped by María's coming freighted with a sense of doom and darkness to her from the first, warning Castel: "I hurt everyone who comes near me" (as if to provide yet another excuse for his eventual disappointment, and action). Indeed, it's really a quite ugly story, at its basic level -- artfully made to appear less horrific by Castel's biting take on society around him. Few of the people he associates with are great readers, and one even complains: Novels in this day and age ! They can write all they want ... but what fool would read one !The words are yet another slap in the face of Castel -- implying, surely, that his sort of art (his paintings) too are no longer necessities of the age either. Yet of course it is Castel's misguided fantasy-world beliefs, straight out of a novel, that prove fatal, to María and, in a sense, to himself. His jealous rage and his suspicion are hardly romantic, yet come straight out of fiction. He sees himself as a sort of romantic hero -- and he is, in a way -- yet it's not a role that fits in the world he's living in. Castel is no true existential hero. He yammers about being misunderstood, the lone figure, in a sea of mediocrity, with true understanding, but he's unable to make another a part of his world, undermining his relationship with María at nearly every turn. But a conventional relationship would presumably prove just as self-destructive for him ..... The Tunnel is stylishly written, and surprisingly funny. Ultimately, however, it is too discomfiting to be entirely successful, its human sacrifice both too terrible and too casual. - M.A.Orthofer, 30 May 2014 - Return to top of the page - The Tunnel:
- Return to top of the page - Argentine author Ernesto Sábato lived 1911 to 2011. - Return to top of the page -
© 2014-2021 the complete review
|