A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: |
Double Indemnity general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
A : clever, fast, sharp See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
The prevalent world view in Double Indemnity is a deeply cynical one; in retrospect, given how and why the story is being told (which is only revealed at the end), there can perhaps be no other.
I was going to get out of there, and drop those renewals and everything else about her like a red-hot poker. But I didn't do it.Phyllis is simply too seductive. As is the possibility of the cash prize of a double indemnity claim on an accident policy. So they join forces and plan her husband's murder. Huff's been in the business long enough to know what it takes to get away with murder. He also knows there are three keys to success, and the one that amateurs always forget is sheer audacity. And the plot they hatch is admittedly bold. One of the keys is that it has to be a railway accident. That's where the double indemnity kicks in. And that's part of the audacity, because the insurance company knows that railway accidents aren't a very common way of getting oneself killed. It's a good plan, and Cain nicely describes how it's done, from getting the insurance policy (very nicely handled) to the alibis to the act itself. Huff has it all planned out, and while it doesn't quite go off without a hitch the hitches are within the built-in margin of error. The insurance company isn't thrilled by the turn of events. They hope for a ruling of suicide (rather than accident), but it's a hard case to make. Still, they're not thrilled about paying -- and they are suspicious. As the head of the Claims Department explains: When a man takes out an insurance policy, an insurance policy that's worth $ 50,000 if he's killed in a railroad accident, and then three months later he is killed in a railroad accident, it's not on the up-and-up. It can't be. If the train got wrecked it might be, but even then it would be a mighty suspicious coincidence. A mighty suspicious accident. No, it's not on the up-and-up. But it's not suicide.No: it has to be murder. But that's easier intuited than proven. Huff isn't in the all-clear very soon, but not too much attention is focussed on him. Phyllis is under suspicion, and it looks -- to the investigators -- like someone else might have also been involved. Nordlinger's daughter (Phyllis' step), Lola, also complicates matters, especially when Huff falls for her. And he also learns that Phyllis is considerably more evil than he had originally thought (as he learns, for example, the fate of the first Mrs. Nordlinger). In fact, Phyllis turns out to be almost too bad to be true. Eventually, Huff decides he has to get rid of her. Only too late does it dawn on him that she might have the same idea ..... Crime, ultimately, does not pay, and Cain nicely, darkly ties it all together. Double Indemnity is an impressive novel. It doesn't have the heat of The Postman always Rings Twice, but, except for super-evil Phyllis, is largely more believable. The dialogue, especially, is excellent: clipped screenplay word-bites, with not a thing too much said. It's a compelling story, and though very dark (there are almost no good guys here) is still very enjoyable. Recommended. - Return to top of the page - Double Indemnity: Reviews: Double Indemnity - the films: James M. Cain:
- Return to top of the page - American author James Mallahan Cain (1892-1977) was, among other things, managing editor of The New Yorker and a screenwriter. He published his first novel when he was forty-two, and achieved great success with several hard-boiled classics. - Return to top of the page -
© 2003-2017 the complete review
|