A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Semmelweis general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
A- : odd, impressive little text See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Louis-Ferdinand Céline was a medical doctor, and he wrote this, his dissertation, on Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis (1818-1865), the doctor best known for making the connection between puerperal ('childbed') fever and (un)sanitary practices of the day, realizing that proper antiseptic procedures could drastically reduce the incidence of infection.
Humanity was getting bored, it burned a few Gods, changed its costume and paid off History with a few new glories.Grand pronouncements come easily to him: In the Story of time, life is nothing but a delirium, the Truth is Death.In his Preface to a later (1936) edition of the work he introduces it as: "the terrible story of Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis", and it is easy to see how he -- like many others after him (see also, for example, Jens Bjørneboe's play, Semmelweis) -- was attracted to this dreadful human fate: a brilliant but intemperate young doctor who has a brilliant insight; a powerful, crushing old guard that refuses to admit the obvious (and fights against it with everything at its disposal), senseless deaths continuing, -- and, finally, the hero's descent into complete madness (culminating in tragic, apposite deaths). Céline is well aware of how little science there was to medicine yet when Semmelweis studied it: As for medicine, in this Universe, it is nothing but a sentiment, a regret, a compassion more active than others, and virtually ineffective in those days when Semmelweis was coming to grips with it.The descriptions of the wards Semmelweis came to work in are horrible -- Céline not needing to go into any sort of detail, but just conveying the general impression (and dread), and the awful statistics (which, at least, seem to have been carefully recorded). Most shocking, of course, is that the evidence Semmelweis offered, and the experiments he wanted to pursue in order to ascertain cause and effect, were thoughtlessly and scornfully rejected -- Céline putting it beautifully-awfully (in John Harman's consistently fine translation): They preferred, out of a bizarre touchiness, to remain in their purulent stupidity, and continue their game of gambling with death.Oh, yes, Céline might have been writing his doctoral dissertation here, a step necessary for him to pursue a medical career, but clearly there's already a completely different kind of writer longing to get out. Semmelweis was a complicated -- and understandably frustrated -- man; comparing him to one of his (more successful) mentors, Céline suggests: Škoda knew how to handle men. Semmelweis wanted to shatter them. An impossibility. He wanted to thrust himself through every stubborn door, he injured himself cruelly. Those doors would not open until after his death.Semmelweis' story, no matter how it is related, is a fascinating one. It's also great material for an author like Céline, himself always combative and often frustrated by the establishment and status quo, and he does not disappoint with his treatment. Semmelweis is a gripping, moving, appalling read. Some of the historical detail can be debated, but the thrust of Céline's argument, and the power of his writing are undeniable. Well worth seeking out. - M.A.Orthofer, 17 February 2015 - Return to top of the page - Semmelweis:
- Return to top of the page - Louis-Ferdinand Céline (1894-1961) was one of the leading as well as most notorious French authors of the 20th century. - Return to top of the page -
© 2015-2021 the complete review
|