A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Multiple Choice general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : amusing concept, nicely realized See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: 'A Note on the Text' at the end of Multiple Choice explains that it is: based on the Chilean Academic Aptitude Test, which students took in December each year from 1967 through 2003 in order to apply to Chilean universities. [...] This book specifically takes the form of the Verbal Aptitude test [Prueba de Aptitud Verbal] as it was given in 1993, the year the author took the exam. At that time it consisted of ninety multiple-choice exercises presented in five sections.Yes, Multiple Choice is a bit like the (verbal part of the) SATs (the nearest US equivalent) -- and in a nice touch the book includes a sheet at the end where readers can mark their answers. (There is, however, no answer key: you will not be graded.) The first section -- 'Excluded Term' -- is the one which is most obviously difficult to make any sort of narrative out of, the point here being to choose: "the word whose meaning has no relation to either the heading or the other words listed". It's also arguably the most challenging to translate, as not all the wordplay -- limited to single word-options -- works in English the same way as Spanish. The change of titles from the Spanish to the English versions of the book -- the understandable substitution of 'Multiple Choice' for 'Facsímil' (facsimile, or copy) -- also immediately comes into play here, as the Spanish version begins: 1. FACSÍMILWhile the English has it: 1. MULTIPLESo the Spanish and English texts diverge ..... Still, there's some creative fun here, from some of the options for 'Blacklist' -- 'shitlist' and 'novelist', for example -- to: 10. COPYIn the second section of the test (questions 25 through 36) each exercise presents five sentences, and then there are five (and, in the final case, ten) options as to what order they can be put in; here, already there are stories to be created. Zambra utilizes not only the different order(s) to allow for different stories, but in some cases the possible answers themselves are revealing, as in one (35), where all five answer-options are identical, or another (33) where one of the answer-options allows for leaving out one of the sentences (the defining: 'You are not crazy'). The third section (questions 37 through 54) presents sentences -- mostly a single one, but also some with several sentences -- with words left out, with readers having to select the most appropriate word(s) to fill in the blank(s). This already allows for more elaborate and meaningful content -- or, for example, pointed political commentary, as in the first of these questions: 37 ____________________ the thousand amendments they've made to it, the Chilean Constitution of 1980 is a piece of shit.In the fourth section (questions 55 through 66) what amount to texts or stories of several lines or paragraphs -- between five and, in the final one, twenty-five -- are presented and readers are given options as to which line(s) or paragraph(s) to eliminate, "because they either do not add information or are unrelated to the rest of the text". Here Zambra can flesh out stories -- and, of course, the options of excising certain (or even all) details can shift and change meaning. In the final section, there are three texts -- actual stories -- each with its own set of 'Reading Comprehension' questions. Here Zambra can tell actual stories -- while the questions about them then allow him to add another dimension, that includes commentary and interpretation. With the first text partially about multiple-choice tests, Zambra can also poke some fun at the larger exercise. (Best answer: option E for question 71: "(E) The kid next to me marked C, so I'm going to mark C as well".) Fragmentary though Multiple Choice is, it builds towards a whole of sorts -- helped by the form of the exercises, which become more substantial, section by section. There is no full, coherent picture of person or country here, and yet the text is a personal and ultimately revealing one; it is also often surprisingly poignant. And Multiple Choice is also a sly and entertaining commentary on nation (and the education/testing system ...). Within the limitations of the form, Multiple Choice is clever and well-realized, and it is certainly good fun. - M.A.Orthofer, 3 August 2016 - Return to top of the page - Multiple Choice:
- Return to top of the page - Chilean author Alejandro Zambra was born in 1975. - Return to top of the page -
© 2016-2024 the complete review
|