A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Enigma of Capital general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : useful examination of capitalism, but not particularly helpful re. alternatives/ways out See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
In The Enigma of Capital David Harvey uses the recent 'crisis of capitalism' (from 2007 to the present, largely in the US and Europe) -- as well as the examples of past crises -- to make his arguments against capitalism itself.
Harvey argues that there is a: "3 per cent compound growth rate that constitutes the capitalist juggernaut", as capitalism functions and feeds on itself by constant growth (with three per cent the magical/necessary minimum for economic satisfaction) -- a growth that, periodically (and, of course, over the long term), is impossible to sustain and leads -- so Harvey -- to increasingly severe crises.
The most recent one, fueled especially by property speculation, again shows some of the weaknesses and problems with capitalism -- as does the growth of the financial sector (especially in the US) over the past few decades, which has been taking an increasingly large share of economic gains (i.e. an increasing percentage of corporate profits come from the financial sector) while the working class has seen no gains for some three decades in the US, as wage repression has meant all gains from increasing productivity has accrued to the top earners.
In midsummer of 2009, one third of the capital equipment in the United States stood idle, while some 17 per cent of the workforce were either unemployed, enforced part-timers or 'discouraged' workers. What could be more irrational than that.As Harvey nicely describes, capitalism will try to find an outlet -- and that often includes moving abroad (in a variety of ways) -- hence the constant striving towards various forms of globalism (and various guises of colonialism ...), punctured by brief retreats into protectionism. The explosion of the use of artificial and opaque derivatives -- of some use, on some scale, but now completely out of control (in all respects) -- is for Harvey just another way: "to avoid the regulator and free the market", with the writing on the wall as to where this will eventually lead (as it already has, in a few isolated instances). Harvey is good on the big picture of capitalism, including its reliance on property rights (and the ability of capitalists/governments to dispossess, in a variety of ways, others) and in repeatedly reminding readers of the social and environmental (in the broadest sense) costs of capitalist expansionism in its relentless search for three per cent (and in the crises that its periodic collapse brings with it). A solid and useful overview of the capitalist condition, Harvey unfortunately does not offer much by way of guidance as to what the alternatives might be. Harvey acknowledges that capitalism has had a run of considerable success for the past few centuries (while also reminding readers of the costs along the way, especially in environmental degradation). A Marxist (who acknowledges that the term 'communism' has become so tainted as no longer to be very helpful), his prescriptions include hard pills for most to swallow: In the field of institutional arrangements, therefore, a whole new conception of property -- of common rather than private property rights -- will be required to make radical egalitarianism work in a radically egalitarian way. The struggle over institutional arrangements, then, has to move to the centre of political concerns.That conception of property is a hard sell, and Harvey doesn't do nearly enough (here) to convince. Similarly, he has good fun with the failures of academic economists in predicting the most recent financial crisis and concludes -- and it's hard to disagree -- that: "The current knowledge structure is clearly dysfunctional and equally clearly illegitimate" -- but his hopes that a new generation might "do something about it" seems wildly optimistic; of all the things students have been protesting against during this financial crisis, what they've been taught hasn't been one of them: they seem perfectly fine continuing to drink the stale old brew -- especially those pursuing 'business' or law degrees --, holding out hope that they too will be able to jump on this good old capitalist bandwagon. Dismissive of capitalist claims of technological innovation as an escape hatch -- pointing out where that has led previously -- Harvey is certain that the capitalist fundamentals (i.e. that perpetual three per cent growth rate) are unsustainable. Yet he acknowledges both that currently: there is no resolute and sufficiently unified anti-capitalist movement that can adequately challenge the reproduction of the capitalist class and the perpetuation of its power on the world stage.And that viable alternatives are hard to conceive of, much less come by. Nevertheless, he continues to hold out hope (including going so far as to suggest that, hey, maybe: "with the collapse of the Soviet empire another communism might also be possible"). The Enigma of Capital is well worth reading for its critique and analysis of capitalism, as Harvey does make many valid and significant observations that are too often overlooked in the general discussion (at least in the US). But when it comes to alternatives, Harvey's suggestions largely fail convince. - M.A.Orthofer, 14 December 2010 - Return to top of the page - The Enigma of Capital:
- Return to top of the page - David Harvey was born in 1935; he teaches at CUNY. - Return to top of the page -
© 2010-2011 the complete review
|