A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Mark and the Void general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B- : too uncertain of what it wants to be/do See our review for fuller assessment.
Review Consensus: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
The Mark and the Void is set in contemporary Ireland, here still (or again) in the throes of yet another wave of financial and banking crises.
A short introductory chapter is like a pitch as to what the novel-to-come might be about, beginning: "Idea for a novel: we have a banker rob his own bank" and concluding, reaching out even more (desperately) to the reader: "That's the set-up. What do you think ? Would people buy it ?"
The novel proper then begins, more or less, with this set-up -- though most of that set-up is background rather than any bank-robbery prep, explaining who the banker central character is and how he got to Dublin but also revealing that he is being watched, and that his watcher will eventually introduce himself into the banker's life: "and at that moment everything will change".
It seems to me that your ife embodies certain values, certain fundamental features of our modern world. We're living in a time of great change, and a man like you is right at the coal-face of that change.Claude doesn't really see it, but he's willing to go along with it and gives Paul greater access to his life, specifically his working life. As it turns out, Paul isn't really interested in writing a novel any longer -- he sees little point to novels any longer, and still seethes about Bimal Benerjee, whose book came out the same time as his and completely overshadowed it. Instead, Paul is looking to rob the bank. Given that it's an investment bank and its assets aren't on site -- indeed, as is meant to be part of the joke, they're arguably entirely intangible (and hence arguably unreal) -- that plan fizzles out very quickly (indeed, far too quickly: the plan may not have been suited for the circumstances, but the basic idea surely had some promise). With it, the novel fizzles out some too -- that promised set-up from the introductory section -- "we have a banker rob his own bank" -- seems to have been tossed aside, and instead we get a mess of other storylines. Despite the fake writing project fizzling Claude and Paul don't lose touch. Paul wants to enlist Claude to help him woo the waitress he has his eye on, while Paul wants to take advantage of Claude for more of his harebrained schemes. Claude sees -- as unobservant Paul doesn't -- that Paul's marriage is collapsing and pushes him to get back to writing -- but Paul sees his future and payday in even less promising schemes. Meanwhile, there's a lot happening at Claude's workplace. Staid Bank of Torabundo weathered the Irish banking crisis well under the cautious stewardship of its CEO -- which, of course, has now cost him his job: It is true that his sceptical attitude saved BOT from financial catastrophe. But once we had survived, the board felt a more audacious leader was needed in order to press home our advantage.The new CEO, Porter Blankly, is: "a man not afraid to take chances", and modern-day finance here is presented as a world in which taking chances -- preferably highly leveraged -- is the only way to make the big bucks. The counterintuitive wins the day, and when things go south the way to save the day is by making even bigger bets -- to the point where even greater powers that be ensure that failure is not an option or possibility -- at least for the big boys (and governments); the common man, of course, doesn't fare very well in this scenario (which is being played out all around Claude all the while). A philosopher that Claude (and surprisingly many other of the characters) are fans of François Texier, who: "had many fascinating ideas about simulacra, and the derealization of modern life". The Mark and the Void is full of simulacra and the derealized: the waitress Claude has his eye on paints pictures in a simulacra-series, and of course the bank's business is entirely removed from reality. Texier, in fact, created a work called The Mark and the Void, too, which also comes to play a role in the novel Like some cancer out of control, Claude's bank grows and mutates (and, of course, soon threatens to implode under the weight of all its less-than-worthless holdings) . The idea behind the rapid growth is worryingly sensible enough: A sufficiently large bank would create its own reality as opposed to simply reacting to consensus.Murray's book tries to be both metatextual meditation on the novel -- what can it be in our time ? is there still a place for it ? and what should the contemporary novel look like ? -- as well as satire on the modern-day finance system. But Murray careens rather wildly about, the novel uncomfortably shifting between pure farce and attempts at more serious commentary about fiction and reality, or about the way the international finance system 'works' (and doesn't). Some of this is reasonably funny -- but far too much isn't; worse, little is seen through particularly well. When Murray goes over the top he undermines much of the rest of his story: the ridiculous figure of Paul's eastern European sidekick, Igor, in particular is overdone in every respect -- not least that: when I type his name into the search engine, a red VIRUS WARNING!!! sign flashes up immediately on the screen, and a moment later a member of the IT team bursts into the office, demanding to know what I've done.Paul's history as a writer, and his still festering feuds with a critic, his editor, and detested Bimal Benerjee -- who of course also shows up, launching a new book -- also don't work particularly well -- and his alternative get-rich-quick schemes are little better. Certainly, the figure of the one-time writer who can't get back on track is hard to do anything new with, but with his Paul -- as with much of the book -- Murray tries to do too many different things, leaving a rather unconvincing mess. Some of the scenes and ideas are decent, but The Mark and the Void is over-stuffed with both, and Murray can't commit to any particular one(s). He tries to have and do it all, but doesn't come close to building an edifice that could sustain it -- relying also rather too often on the cheap (and generally just not that funny) laugh. Much of the writing is engaging enough, and the ideas intriguing enough, to keep readers going, but there's rarely enough payoff to impress, and even the final (and not entirely unexpected) turn is rather more fizzle than surprise. - M.A.Orthofer, 8 November 2015 - Return to top of the page - The Mark and the Void:
- Return to top of the page - Irish author Paul Murray was born in 1975. - Return to top of the page -
© 2015-2022 the complete review
|