A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
The Eagle's Throne general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : odd approach, but some decent political intrigue See our review for fuller assessment.
Review Consensus: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: The Eagle's Throne is set in the future -- 2020 -- and yet is almost defiantly old-fashioned. The premise leading to the unusual approach Fuentes has chosen is that the Mexican President has ticked off the Americans, with dire results: We woke up on January 2 with our oil, our gas, and our principles intact, but with out communications systems cut off from the rest of the world. The United States, alleging a glitch in the satellite communications system that they so kindly allow us to use, has left us with no faxes, no e-mail, no grid, and no telephone service.It's a completely unbelievable premise, but it'll do. And what do the characters in the novel -- Mexico's ruling elite -- do in this situation ? They write each other letters. Yes, The Eagle's Throne is a letter-novel in the best tradition of, say, Choderlos de Laclos -- and, like Dangerous Liaisons, it is filled with intrigue and infighting. Almost more unbelievable than the premise which sets them all letter-writing in the first place are, in fact, the letters themselves: it's hard to believe that after almost two decades in which 'texting' and 'Instant Messaging' have become (surely) near-ubiquitous that these are the sort of missives and declarations people would write. The letters are like 18th and 19th century correspondence, going on in the most leisurely and expansive manner about all and sundry. It's hard to imagine anyone would still have the patience to write such things. And, of course, it's hard to imagine anyone would set down such incriminating evidence (as a lot of it is) in black on white, either. The advantage of the approach, of course, is that it offers the (many) characters' perspectives, just as they want to present themselves. Which doesn't mean they don't lie and try to manipulate, but certainly there is a sense of immediacy that isn't there in other mediated approaches. Fuentes uses it to decent enough effect to justify it, though it's a shame he didn't make it sound more authentic (i.e. have them write the way people reduced to letter-writing in 2020 are more likely to -- instead of all sticking to the same template that's a hundred years out of date). The Eagle's Throne is a political novel. Upsetting the Americans makes for a crisis, but that's not what's of primary concern to the characters. Instead, the focus is on gaining power by reaching the 'Eagle's Throne', the Mexican presidency. Elections are still a few years away, but people are already positioning themselves (and, as frequently, being positioned by others). It takes a while for Fuentes to set the stage, because there are so many characters to introduce. From the current and former president to various administration figures, Fuentes has a great deal of jockeying going on. Much is set in motion by María del Rosario Galván's getting very young Nicolás Valdivia "into the inner sanctum of the presidency" -- with young Nicolás eventually rising up in it much faster than anyone could have expected. Among the bad guys is the president's chief of staff, Tácito de la Canal, who has presidential ambitions but also a paper trail that ties him to "a colossal fraud". But he's not the only one with secrets: María is keeping one as well. And there's the question about those missing years in Nicolás' background ..... The death of the president changes the situation fundamentally -- and even more secrets that could wreak havoc lurk elsewhere (such as 'The Man in the Nopal' mask, Mexico's very own answer to the iron-masked Dumas hero). Indeed, the last hundred pages of the novel are thriller-exciting, and pack quite a few good surprises and twists. But the novel is considerably longer than that, and the set-up isn't anywhere near as compelling. This is also very much a novel focussed on Mexico, Fuentes putting in a great deal about Mexican politics and history, from the consequences of the president not being allowed to stand for re-election to the effects of corruption. "Mexico's problems go back for centuries", he has an ex-president claim, and Fuentes tries to show what many of these are. There's too much gross simplification here -- Fuentes falls back on the very old-fashioned approach of defining something as absurd as a 'national identity' (and reducing it to fairly simple terms, too). Still, a lot of it sounds fairly good, and it is at least believable that the self-important characters would spout all this nationalist (and nation-bashing) nonsense. Fuentes doesn't make it easy for himself or his readers with his epistolary approach, and he's surprisingly reluctant to mine it for all it is worth (or at least play around a bit stylistically -- the tone isn't identical in all the letters, but it's like they all come from the same generation, all having learned how to write a proper letter at the same school, sticking to a basic template). It also takes quite a while to really get the story rolling -- though the last third is the quite effective. Far from a failure, The Eagle's Throne is, however, also only a qualified success. - Return to top of the page - The Eagle's Throne:
- Return to top of the page - Mexican author Carlos Fuentes lived 1928 to 2012. Winner of the Venezuelan Romulo Gallegos Prize (for Terra Nostra) and the Cervantes Prize (1997). He has taught at Harvard, Princeton, Brown, and Columbia, among other universities. - Return to top of the page -
© 2006-2016 the complete review
|