A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Memory Theatre general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : playful, smart See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
The narrator of Memory Theatre closely resembles Simon Critchley in biography and accomplishment -- though these diverge in the latter parts of the book (fortunately for the author, one might add).
I was dying. That much was certain. The rest is fiction.Of course, we're all always dying, in the sense that we're inexorably moving towards the moment of our death. This, too, is the sense in which the narrator means it -- even if he believes (or, in his mind, knows) himself to be more certain about the timing of that end-point ..... The rest may be fiction -- a novel lies ahead, after all -- yet exactly how he means that also only becomes clear in the book's conclusion; misleadingly (in a way), much of the novel is grounded in the factual, many of the names and works referred to all very real. From this brief look at what awaited him -- not yet death, but the certainty of impending death -- the narrator goes back in time to tell the story of how he got to that point. Having moved from England to New York in 2004 (as Critchley did), he returns to the University of Essex in the summer to clear out his office and finds some boxes that have been left to him -- "the unpublished papers, notes, and remains of a close friend and former philosophy teacher of mine in France, Michel Haar", who had died the year before. (Haar, too, is a real figure, just as described in the novel, who did actually pass away in 2003.) Among Haar's areas of interest was the idea of the 'memory theatre', as famously discussed by Frances Yates in her classic book, The Art of Memory, and much of the material in the boxes deals with that (culminating in: "Michel's simple but brilliant idea was to read Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit as a memory theatre, namely as continuation of Yates's tradition of the art of memory"). Among Haar's other areas of interest was ... astrology, including the drawing up of what amount to variations on horoscopes. Critchley carefully lays the groundwork of his novel in its first part, a theoretical basis that introduces the ideas he works with -- an accessible introduction to the 'memory theatre'-idea across the ages and various attempts to build (in one form or another) a physical version. A jolt comes when, nearly midway through, the narrator reveals why he might have a particular interest in this capturing and holding of memory, as he mentions a trauma from his younger days, a trauma that, in fact, he had little memory of. Even later: I would get flashbacks, for sure, but they were often vague and they didn't necessarily feel like my memories. My self felt like a theater with no memory. All the seats were empty. Nothing was happening onstage.And then there are those 'memory maps' among Haar's papers, sort of like horoscopes but based only partially on astrological data and incorporating much else too. Haar drew these up for a variety of philosophers, some long dead, some contemporary. And there's one for the narrator, too -- presenting not only a clear picture of his life (including many: "events that Michel couldn't possibly have known about") that goes not just to the present but beyond. Including specifying a place and (not too distant) time of death. The narrator has little doubt about the accuracy of the chart. He takes his death -- at the appointed place and hour -- to be inevitable. And in preparing for it he too takes up -- in an ambitious, personal way -- the 'memory theatre'-concept. Critchley shows a nice touch in how and where he leads his fictional alter ego -- teaching him a lesson, as it were (and readers, too, albeit in a slightly different manner). Memory Theatre is a work of philosophical fiction -- a thought experiment, even -- but it wears its learning lightly. Critchley mentions many names, works of scholarship, and ideas -- and offers an appendix consisting of 'A partial glossary of potential obscurities' providing a bit more information about people (and places, etc.) referred to in the story -- but not in a way that fatally weighs down the narrative. It ultimately amounts to a personal journey of (what turns out to be somewhat painful) discovery, as well as a neat meditation on the nature of memory and experience. It's certainly a clever read -- with some enjoyable trickiness to it -- but it also convinces simply as a story. Good (and quite thoughtful) fun. - M.A.Orthofer, 23 July 2015 - Return to top of the page - Memory Theatre:
- Return to top of the page - Simon Critchley was born in 1960. He teaches philosophy at the New School in New York. - Return to top of the page -
© 2015 the complete review
|