A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Metropole general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : enjoyably spun-out scenario See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
The premise of Metropole is simple enough: Hungarian linguist Budai is set to go to a conference in Helsinki but gets on the wrong plane.
When he disembarks he finds himself in a place where no one understands anything he says -- in any number of languages -- and where they speak a language completely foreign to him.
He only notices something is wrong once he is in town, and though he does manage to get a room at a hotel everything remains essentially foreign.
He tried to console her by stroking her but thanks to his clumsiness the movement came out all wrong and he found himself like an idiot clutching her elbow, not knowing what to do with it.Clutching elbows is about the best he can do. Despite putting his scholarly skills to best use, the language remains beyond him, and without the language there's little hope of anything else. He does find he can get work if he has to (as he does, once his money runs out) but for the most he is the outsider who will never be able to get in. Budai almost hopes that this is all part of some plot against him, that he was abducted to this place and is being kept here by someone out, for some reason to get him, because: If, on the other hand, it was only blank stares and mere indifference that were detaining him -- which looked more likely -- there was only negative energy to draw on, an immobility that would prevent him attracting anyone's attention or interest. And how, in that case, was he to extricate himself from this tepid slough of feeling when there was nothing to cling to, no firm ground on which to set his feet ?But, of course, Metropole is also an allegory, and this tepid slough is the human condition itself ..... There is no way out -- just the illusion of hope (which Karinthy does ultimately grant his character). The linguist-angle is deceptive: it allows Karinthy to set his character trying, very professionally, to go about solving this dilemma -- in his efforts, for example, at decoding the written language, like any scholar would. But the impossibility of communication is a universal, with Budai's situation just an ironical extreme. Only once does Budai encounter that which he is probably seeking: it is an ugly scene, but it is one of connexion between two people -- and yet: This time Budai made an exception and did not try to work out what was happening. Even if he had known the language he would probably have made little sense of it: it was a private matter, hopeless and infinitely complex, completely alien as far as he was concerned. It was nothing to do with him and he felt no desire to know more.But it all has nothing to do with him, not just this obvious scene, and he remains entirely apart, and always will. Karinthy's evocation of Budai's linguistic isolation is just an extreme example of every individual's complete social isolation. In everyday life we have the words (and go through the motions), yet really don't get any farther with one another than Budai does. (Written in 1970 in Hungary, the book surely made its point even more obviously to that audience: Budai's story begins with him setting out for abroad (and to the West) -- a freedom that many Hungarians could only dream of at that time --, yet finds himself in a stupefying, uncomprehending world; perhaps Karinthy's Hungarian readers took heart in the notion that utter alienation is, indeed, everywhere.) Though fairly obvious, Metropole is an enjoyable allegory, Karinthy spinning out Budai's nightmare quite well. Worthwhile. - Return to top of the page - Metropole:
- Return to top of the page - Hungarian author Karinthy Ferenc lived 1921 to 1992. - Return to top of the page -
© 2009-2011 the complete review
|