A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
Irène Némirovsky general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : useful but limited See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Jonathan Weiss' Irène Némirovsky filled a void when it appeared, first in French in 2005, and then in English in 2007.
The phenomenal success of Suite Française
-- the previously unpublished Némirovsky novel -- and the author's tragic fate (she died at Auschwitz more than six decades before this final publishing triumph) led to renewed -- or entirely new -- interest in the author.
While never entirely forgotten in France she was certainly no longer a household name before Suite Française surfaced, and in the English-speaking world -- despite earlier translations of several of her books -- she was almost entirely unknown.
Rather than a public act, intended to protect the family by giving it a Catholic identity (which would have convinced neither the Germans nor the Vichy French), Irène's conversion appears to have risen from a strictly personal spirituality, one that is foreshadowed in her writings of the period, which show a marked sensibility towards a Christian ideal of abnegation and suffering.It's a plausible hypothesis, but there's little evidence on offer, and for such a bold claim -- and significant act -- Weiss should have made a lot more of it. There's very little about specifically her family life in any case, with little sense of her relationship with her husband or children. Worse, there's very little about her relationship with her parents, and especially her mother. Weiss mentions several of her books in which there's a young girl "with an implacable hatred for her mother" (including The Ball) -- and that there are obviously autobiographical elements here. But the best Weiss can do is to suggest: It is quite probable that Irène herself had a stormy relationship with her own mother, even though she reveals little about herself in her family letters.Given the mother-daughter relationships portrayed in Némirovsky's fiction, it's hard to imagine that anything is as significant regarding her own 'identity' as her relationship with her mother. But aside from an anecdote about a dispute over some furs, Weiss gives (or finds) no hints of the tensions and consequences -- perhaps the greatest failing in this study. Among the other open issues is the question of money: Némirovsky seems to have been raking it in (earning more than her banker-husband, Weiss notes), but Weiss also frequently describes her almost desperately seeking out more opportunities and yet -- especially as the German noose tightened -- of the family being in financial straits (of sorts). It's unclear what lavish lifestyle they spend their money on; indeed, there's little sense of her lifestyle at all. For better or worse Weiss focusses on Némirovsky's work, and insofar as much of it was (and quite a bit still is) inaccessible to English-reading audiences this is fairly useful, giving a good overview of her oeuvre. Here, too, the focus is on the anti-Semitic question, and specifically on David Golder -- though given that this early work was her greatest success this seems appropriate. Weiss takes a fairly neutral stance regarding the Jewish question -- though tending to give Némirovsky the benefit of the doubt, and working hard to place it in the context of the times (which apparently is some sort of excuse). But her own words -- not even only in the book itself, but in her defense -- certainly feel like nails in the coffin, as for example hilariously: Irène attempted to justify herself by raising two points: first, as a Jew herself she couldn't be charged with anti-Semitism; second, she was merely giving a faithful portrait of characters she knew from her own life: "that is the way I saw them."It's unfortunate that Weiss does not follow through here: Némirovsky's books are filled with unsympathetic and often almost unbelievably unpleasant figures, and it may very well be that that is really the way she saw them and the world -- one thinks not only of the Jewish characters but all those moms from hell. The question is: why did she see people like this ? What kind of warped (?) perception did she have of the world around her ? And why ? Perhaps the most disturbing of her comments about David Golder Weiss quotes are those from 1939, a decade after her novel was first published: "How could I write such a thing ? If I were to write David Golder now, I would do it quite differently ... The climate is quite changed !It's the last sentence that is so disturbing, suggesting not regret but rather that Némirovsky would simply pander differently now. Weiss' Irène Némirovsky is a good, basic introduction to the author, but only adequate as such. Her work is fairly well covered, but there's far too little about her life, and far too little insight (or even just plain speculation) about the influence of her life on her work. For now it will have to do, but look forward to much more thorough biographies to come (such as the translation of La Vie d'Irène Némirovsky by Olivier Philipponat and Patrick Lienhardt). - Return to top of the page - Irène Némirovsky:
- Return to top of the page - Jonathan Weiss teaches at Colby College. - Return to top of the page -
© 2008-2021 the complete review
|