A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
Meeting at the Milestone general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : powerful if not entirely successful book about Norway under German occupation in World War II See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Meeting at the Milestone is a book about Norway under the German occupation, the population divided into collaborators and resistance fighters (aside from the many who simply tried to get on with life without committing themselves outright to either side).
First published in 1947, it is meant to be a book of some immediacy -- and parts of the book are dated 1947, the narrator organising his thoughts and papers as he describes the events of the past years.
It was important to keep one's options open. Put a little on both horses. Not quite the same on both, obviously, because one did have a sort of idea who would win, but --The cost is high, and the narrator -- though on the 'right' side (he is part of the resistance) -- is keenly aware of weakness even in himself, and he can empathise with many who made the wrong choice. He collects these writings because he hopes to better understand what led some to join the Party and help the Germans: you search for the cause --or causes -- however fumblingly. If you could find them, there is a possibility that such dreadful things might be prevented in the futureA long section of the novel is devoted to his account of his student days. A country boy in the big city (Oslo), the divide between his rural roots and his cosmopolitan ambition is always a presence -- as it was in so much of Norway. Many of those he encountered around 1920 figure also in the sections that take place in World War II, each (including him) marked by decisions they made and events that happened back then. The narrator discusses his early fumbling love-life at some length, revealing how much he was moved by happenstance -- the girl who happens to cross his path at the right (or wrong) moment -- as well as the less than honourable choices he made. It is, of course, a reflection of the choices others would go on to make under the Nazis, the narrator showing how easy it was to essentially fall into one camp or another, and how little idealism or even realism might have to do with it. He makes the right choice (regarding the Nazis), but doesn't think of himself as superior; he knows that he had failed earlier in his life. The parallels are quite cleverly drawn, as the narrator is confronted with his past on his mission to Norway for the resistance, trying to find out who was betraying the cause. Practically everywhere he turns, it's not a case of black and white -- just a muddy grey. The personal also intrudes on the political, as the man who 'saved' the woman he let down as a student -- and who has raised his son thinking (for the most part) it was his own -- now works for the Nazis. And it is the woman the narrator let down who, in turn, now saves him. The occupation damaged and destroyed lives in ways beyond the obvious, and it is this that Hoel is particularly good at conveying. This is a book of broken lives, the difficulty of doing the right thing, on small scales and large, having lingering and often horrible consequences. Moral ambiguity pervades the book, making for an unsettling read. Death results from some of the betrayals and actions, but it is what happens to those that survive that is most unnerving. The book -- and its reflective, retrospective approach -- is a bit awkwardly paced, the long look back to his student days seeming for too long a detour. Hoel describes the student life (and the narrator's love-life) well, which is perhaps why he goes on at such length -- but it's perhaps more than necessary (and shifts the focus too much). Still, there is some excellent detail here, such as when the father warns the narrator of the wanton women of Oslo and the narrator recalls having come across Knut Hamsun's Hunger hidden among his father's books and thinking: "Such books should really be off limits for parents", his discomfort beautifully reflecting the generation- (and cultural) gap that -- as the fact that both father and son have read the book suggests -- isn't quite what he imagines it to be, but nevertheless is unbridgeable. Elsewhere in the book -- near the beginning and end -- there is actual adventure and tension too, as the resistance efforts are described, a spy and resistance story that has held up very well. But the different parts don't fit together neatly enough. This is a good book, but it falls short, just, -- largely in its presentation -- of being a great one. The material, and the idea, is there, but while the presentation does reflect the narrator's uncertainty very well, it ultimately makes for a less than entirely satisfying take, perhaps still too close to the events. Still: worthwhile. - Return to top of the page - Meeting at the Milestone:
- Return to top of the page - Sigurd Hoel (1890-1960) was one of the leading literary figures in Norway in the first half of the 20th century. - Return to top of the page -
© 2005-2011 the complete review
|