A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Council of Egypt general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : sharp and quite nicely done See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
The Council of Egypt begins with lowly Don Giuseppe Vella being called to duty when the Moroccan ambassador to Naples is shipwrecked in Sicily on his way back home, in 1782.
As the only person they can find who speaks some Arabic -- rather less than he lets on, but he's a born dissimulator -- Vella acts as translator and guide -- and grabs opportunity when the ambassador is consulted about an Arabic text in a local monastery.
The ambassador shrugs it off as: "Merely a life of the Prophet. One of many", but Vella doesn't let on, claiming the ambassador identifies it as a "precious codex" -- about "the Arab conquest of Sicily".
Well, then, how can such a man fabricate out of nothing a whole historical period that I am competent, in some measure, to verify ? [...] Believe me. Vella knows Arabic. And I will tell you one more thing: he knows only Arabic; in our own language he cannot so much as compose a letter.But even if Vella isn't well-read or familiar with much history, he has enough smarts and is willing to put in the work to create a convincing 'translation' -- an entirely novel work, in fact (with nothing of the underlying Prophet- biography showing through ...): "with great skill and art, the Arabic Codex of San Martino had been entirely corrupted". And his audience -- mostly corrupted in their own ways, too -- is more than willing to let themselves be convinced by the fraud. Enjoying his success, Vella has grander ambitions: to make a: 'The Council of Egypt' out of yet another Arabic manuscript, to follow this 'The Council of Sicily'. Vella can convince himself -- and a collaborator he needs to make things look more authentic -- that what he's doing isn't wrong at all: Don Giuseppe would explain to him at length how the work of the historian is all deception, all fraud; how there was more merit in inventing history than in transcribing it from old maps and tablets and ancient tombs; how, therefore, in all honesty, their efforts deserved an immensely larger compensation than the work of a real historianAnd, indeed, Vella finds compensation is forthcoming -- if he tweaks history, or simply makes it up, that benefits, in one way or another, the present-day powers that be. And, of course, some of the other powers aren't entirely pleased, complaining: What hasn't he handed over to the Crown through the Council of Egypt ? Coastal holdings, farms, rivers, tuna concessions -- things we've owned for centuries, things no king or viceroy has even challenged our right toDoubts remain and resurface. Vella does well when confronting one of those called to inspect his work, but long term there's no covering the fact that he, and his translations, are frauds. Vella is the comic anti-hero of the novel, but another figure also plays a prominent role, the lawyer Di Blasi, a contrast to the political (and other corruption) all around who eventually comes to suffer -- horrifically -- for his beliefs. It is Di Blasi who also best sums up not only Vella's stunt but the Sicilian condition -- of the day (as the French Revolution swirls nearby) but also, Sciascia obviously implies, far beyond as well: (E)very society produces the particular kind of imposture that suits it best, so to speak. Our society is a fraud, a joke, a judicial, literary, human fraud -- yes, I would say human too, for it is fraudulent in its very essence. So our societ has produced, quite simply and naturally, a reverse fraudThe Council of Egypt moves from the sly and then occasionally broadly comic -- Vella's antics are very good fun -- to the rather darker fate Di Blasi ultimately faces. Sciascia seems hesitant as to just how serious he wants the book to be, and so he pokes near the surface, for the most part (in part necessarily, as the novel quickly covers quite a time span). Still, it's an effective, mordant critique -- and while the story occasionally moves fitfully and can feel crowded with a confusion of names (which hardly matter: among Sciascia's amusing twists is that Vella never even bothers to really learn the name of the visiting ambassador, and simply ascribes one to him, after the fact) it is an enjoyable read. - M.A.Orthofer, 24 June 2016 - Return to top of the page - The Council of Egypt:
- Return to top of the page - Italian author Leonardo Sciascia lived 1921 to 1989. - Return to top of the page -
© 2016 the complete review
|