A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: |
Crash general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : interesting study of the book and film See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
J.G.Ballard's seminal 1973 novel, Crash, and David Cronenberg's controversial 1996 film have both been much discussed.
In this study -- an attractive volume in the estimable BFI (British Film Institute) Modern Classics series -- Iain Sinclair explores both film and book, a valuable essay that raises as many questions as it answers.
Appropriately, perhaps, as both the film and book challenge readers and viewers, not offering easy answers.
Crash works best if it's viewed as a necrophile masque, a post-mortem look on an undead book. The low-key performances, the subdued light, the lacklustre physical permutations, all contribute to an overwhelming sense of alienation. The film is alienated from itself, as well as from Ballard's wild-energy novel. It's an elegy to boredom, loss, futility: to Ballard's "death of affect".The book includes an interview with Ballard, useful in placing Ballard's work in context. Sinclair, who has been around for a while, is comfortable and familiar with the literary (and art) scene of the 1960s and 70s, and he usefully examines Ballard and his work against this backdrop. One drawback, however, is that Sinclair is an inveterate name-dropper and not all of the names (most of which are, indeed, literally dropped, without much explanation) will be familiar. And even where they are Sinclair insists on being overly familiar (we're sure it really is "Nic" Roeg to his buddies, but still ...). Readers who do not recall the London scene of two or three decades ago might occasionally find themselves at a loss, as might Americans confronted with the "BFI" and "ICA". Sinclair also spins out Ballard's premise of the "death of affect" and the notion of "Crash" by re-examining a number of spectacular crashes -- from James Dean's and Jayne Mansfield's to that of Princess Di. It is perhaps the most interesting aspect of the book. Ballard's Crash is an almost unreadable book (see our review), but it is based on a very interesting idea. I.e. it is great in theory, poor in practice. (Much the same can be said about Cronenberg's film version.) By focussing on the ideas behind it, Sinclair highlights the significance of the text. Unfortunately, Sinclair's essay presupposes familiarity with the text and/or film and so, regrettably, is not a true substitute for either. It is, however, a welcome and useful complement to them. Among the few true shortcomings of the essay is Sinclair's unwillingness to examine the controversy surrounding the film. It could not be shown in certain countries, and it served for much lively debate -- as had the book upon publication, twenty-odd years earlier. While Sinclair addresses some of the issues at issue (the sex, the violence) he gives too little space to the actual protests and outrage and the possible reasons behind these -- a striking omission. Nevertheless, the essay is a valuable gloss on both the novel and the film and we certainly recommend it. Sinclair is very good at highlighting the issues raised by both, ideas that readers/viewers may have been unwilling to consider because they were so put off by the qualities (and lack thereof) of the text and/or film -- significant ideas well worth considering. - Return to top of the page - Crash:
- Return to top of the page - London author Iain Sinclair has written several collections of poetry, as well as a number of novels and documentary works. - Return to top of the page -
© 1999-2010 the complete review
|