A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Truth about Marie general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : further variations in the relationship-saga, with some great scenes See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Toussaint again dips into the well: Marie is back -- yes, the same Marie from Making Love and Running Away.
we had made love at the same time that night, Marie and I, but not with each other.It's a nice idea, and perfectly captures both their separation (only half a mile apart, so not even that all that far physically ...) as well as how they continue to live on almost parallel paths, their desires and lives still intimately in tune, (though the fact that the women he was with was also named Marie is perhaps ... a bit much). Marie's love-making does not go well: the guy she's with goes into cardiac arrest and is taken to hospital by emergency services; Marie doesn't go along out of consideration for the guy's wife, who presumably wouldn't need the double shock of finding both a gravely ill husband and then how he had wound up in this state. Marie calls the narrator, and he of course immediately rushes over; they may be leading separate lives, but: we understood each other, we'd always understood each other, I loved her, yes. It may be very imprecise to say I loved her, but nothing could be more precise.Late in his account, the narrator admits to his "imperfect knowledge of what happened" that night, and: the many murky areas surrounding that evening, were hardly a handicap for me. On the contrary, this forced me to employ my imagination to a much greater degree, pressed me to provide all the details in my mind, whereas had I really been there I'd simply have remembered everything.The Truth about Marie is a book built on such 'imperfect knowledge', relating not only what happened with Marie and her lover on that night, but also offering a long section of their being together in Tokyo. The narrator notes -- well into his account -- that Marie's lover's name was actually Jean-Baptiste de Ganay, but he nevertheless continues to refer to him as he had from the beginning, as Jean-Christophe de G. Imagination, and whatever spin his mind puts on facts, trumps reality. Much of the novel is, in fact, a flight of fantasy, of what the narrator imagines Marie experienced. Both Jean-Christophe de G.'s heart attack and the scenes with them in Japan, which involve a race horse and then its transport by plane, are stunning pieces of writing: detailed, vibrant, arresting. Yet, as the narrator reminds us, they are embellishments -- grounded in fact, but then entirely (re-)imagined by him who was present at best briefly and peripherally (and certainly not for most of the action). It is his certainty about knowing Marie -- and knowing the truth about Marie -- that allows him to take this imaginative leap. He insists: I may have been mistaken in many of my assumptions about Jean-Cristophe de G., but never in those about Marie, I knew Marie's every move, I knew how she would have reacted in every circumstance, I knew her instinctively, my knowledge of her was innate, natural, I possessed absolute intelligence regarding the details of her life: I knew the truth about Marie.So, despite physical separation, there's still quite a bond here; no wonder that they can't quite seem to let go of one another. Yet it also raises the question: how much of this love is entirely in the narrator's mind ? After all, if he knows 'the truth about Marie' -- and can fill in any blanks in her life, as he does in the episodes her relates here -- isn't the (physical) Marie superfluous ? Well, apparently not entirely. The Truth about Marie is another variation on this odd relationship-game Toussaint has been playing across several books now -- an elaborate will they/won't they or can they/can't they. Much of it is very impressive -- especially those scenes the narrator doesn't have first-hand experience of, which could stand on their own as first-rate, superbly written stories -- but the relationship aspect isn't entirely satisfying, especially in conjunction with the previous novels in the Marie-saga. With clouds (and flames) of doom hanging over so much here -- even when characters find each other (or have sex), the big picture is rarely a pretty (and often an ominous) one, from Jean-Cristophe de G. keeling over to the striking closing image of the book -- Toussaint does the whole 'impossibility of love'-idea well, but also lays it on pretty thick. After a while (and three books) that can get very wearing. (The fact that for all his intimate knowledge Marie remains somewhat enigmatic -- and that it can be tough to see what he sees in her -- doesn't help.) The writing is very impressive, but as a whole The Truth about Marie doesn't quite convince; maybe Toussaint has held on to Marie for too long and he should have just let his narrator leave the phone ringing when she called ..... - M.A.Orthofer, 30 August 2011 - Return to top of the page - The Truth about Marie:
- Return to top of the page - Jean-Philippe Toussaint was born in Brussels in 1957. - Return to top of the page -
© 2011-2021 the complete review
|