A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
How to Talk About general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : enjoyable variations on the theme See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: Pierre Bayard's three-part study of How to Talk About Places You've Never Been considers: 'Various Ways of Not Traveling'; 'Talking about Travel'; and 'Procedures to Follow'. In his Prologue he already suggests: There is actually nothing to show that traveling is the best way to discover a town or a country you do no know. Everything points to the contrary -- and the experience of numerous writers supports this -- if you want to be able to talk about a place, the best thing to do is stay at home.Bayard offers a variety of examples of the equivalent of armchair travelers who nevertheless wrote about distant places they (generally) claimed to have visited, from Marco Polo (who, as Bayard notes, certainly seems to have missed a lot for someone ostensibly traveling through China) to disgraced reporter for The New York Times Jayson Blair to German adventure-novelist Karl May. Many, if not all, of his examples are writers who rely on other written records; indeed, it is here that non-travel is the most interesting -- as, for example, he writes of Chateaubriand: His encounter with countries is fundamentally intertextual -- that is to say, it is also an encounter with books, which are called to the rescue whenever he is forced to skip a step.There are also examples of travel-by-(human-)proxy -- Édouard Glissant sending his wife to the Easter Islands and writing based on her impressions -- but reliance on other (generally written) sources is far more common. Bayard suggests there's a fundamental validity to this sort of deception. In some cases, (non-)travelers seem to be willingly taken in because they're simply not willing to take the extra step -- Margaret Mead's socio-anthropological method is a case in point -- but elsewhere the deception is entirely intentional: people setting out to fool others. Jean-Claude Romand's elaborate if small-scale pretend-travel -- its audience essentially family and friends --, chronicled in Emmanuel Carrère's The Adversary, is essentially a private deception -- while George Psalmanazar, presenting himself in Europe in the early eighteenth century as a man from Formosa, was entirely a public show and ruse. As Bayard notes, the audience is often complicit in the deception, hearing and believing what they want to -- a vision of the distant and often exotic that fits the image they have in their own mind's eye (those free-loving Samoans ...) much more closely than any reality could: "her Samoan novel was a useful fiction", he notes about Mead's supposedly scientific writing, for example. Bayard appreciates these travel-fictions, but perhaps doesn't show enough concern about the flip-side, their unreality damaging, too, because while they may well present a world-view that is, in some or many ways convincing, it often mis-represents reality -- a lie that is often far from benign. Bayard collects and presents an interesting variety of more-or-less armchair travelers, and his discussions are entertaining and often clever. Not quite the how-to guide the (English) title seems to promise, Bayard's little study does offer a nice overview of the subject and its implications. - M.A.Orthofer, 24 February 2016 - Return to top of the page - How to Talk About Places You've Never Been:
- Return to top of the page - Pierre Bayard was born in 1954. He is a psychoanalyst and teaches literature at the University of Paris VIII, and he has written numerous books. - Return to top of the page -
© 2016 the complete review
|