A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: |
The Sea came in at Midnight general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B- : meandering visions of the apocalypse in our age -- a novel that tries too hard to seem profound See our review for fuller assessment.
Review Consensus: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Erickson's millennial novel has some promising pieces to it.
It begins, pretty much, with the seventeen year old Kristin employed at (and living in) "one of the revolving memory hotels of Tokyo's Kabuki-cho section," telling her life story to a customer who just died.
At memory hotels it is not sex but rather memories that are for sale.
Kristin, who does not dream but does remember, is apparently fairly good at this sort of thing.
... the new millennium, which he called the Age of Apocalypse, had not begun at New Year's Eve 1999 after all. (...) the true Age of Apocalypse had begun well before 31 December 1999, at exactly 3:02 in the morning on the seventh of May, in the year 1968.How does he know ? He was there. It's almost a fun little idea, with Erickson getting to weave in all the proofs of the apocalypse -- all the terrible and bizarre things that have happened since then which, listed as they are in the book, certainly make it sound as though these were already apocalyptic times. Occupant has an Apocalyptic Calendar that circles his room, a "sky-blue mural blotting out the windows and overflowing the walls onto the floor and ceiling." The dates are not sequential, the calendar not linear, -- and it never sounds too convincing except as a literary device. There are diverse strands of the far-flung story that get tied together. Paths and lives cross, connected mainly by the far-travelling Kristin. Among the figures are the husband and wife filmmakers, Louise and Mitch, (wonder how they might be related to Kristin ... ?) who produce the first "snuff" film (in which an actress gets killed in front of the camera). Their snuff film was, in fact, a hoax, but it spawned lots of truer-to-life imitations. All the copycat filmmakers -- and Mitch -- get themselves "mysteriously" killed, and then Louise goes looking for absolution and redemption by buying (and stealing) all the existing copies of the original film. Then there are all these satellite dishes, painted black. And people who can't dream and can't stop dreaming, and a cartographer, mapping the world (but unable to find his way around), and the kinky Japanese with their memory hotels, and Occupant's own past. And so on. The ideas aren't half bad -- well, some of them are pretty bad, but it is material that something can be built out of. And Erickson is generally a decent writer, who one would expect to be able to mold a decent fiction out of such stuff. This, however, does not fly. Generally it just thuds, thwarted by its own ambition. This is what Erickson's book comes to: Everyone is his own millennium, he says.Bonus points for not cringing ! Philip K. Dick could pull off this sort of book, and even someone like Jonathan Carroll could do enough with the strands to keep us engaged. Erickson fails because his ambition is way too lofty -- far beyond his means. He doesn't want to write a P.K.Dick or Jonathan Carroll-type book -- he wants to be profound. And that is, to date, a talent he lacks. The results are not deadly -- the ideas are fun, and they keep coming as he veers from place to place, and the writing is fairly solid -- but they are disappointing. The best scene in the book is, not surprisingly, a tossed-off aside, about Madrid in 1975, as Franco lies dying. Here, briefly, Erickson captures a scene and a piece of history perfectly -- only to undo it just as quickly with the bigger picture that particular narrator finds himself in. One tries to give Erickson the benefit of the doubt with what he is trying to do here, but neither the grand concept nor the mumbo jumbo is convincing. The effort to appear deep and meaningful is embarrassing, because, in fact, there is so little depth to the book. Some resonance, yes, -- the pieces aren't bad -- but he tries to make too much out of too little, and the sum winds up being even less than the parts. A millennial dud. - Return to top of the page - Reviews:
- Return to top of the page - American author Steve Erickson was born in 1950. He has written several fairly highly acclaimed novels. - Return to top of the page -
© 2000-2010 the complete review
|