A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Beauty and Sadness general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : melancholy exploration of obsession and passion See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Beauty and Sadness begins with fifty-four year old author Oki Toshio traveling to Kyoto over the Christmas-New Year's holidays.
The nominal reason for his trip is to hear the tolling of the New Year's Eve bells, a chance to hear in person what he annually listens to on the radio.
But there's more to Oki's impulsive decision -- "a defiant wish to see Ueno Otoko again after all these years".
It was the tragic love story of a very young girl and a man himself still young but with a wife and child: only the beauty of it had been heightened, to the point that it was unmarred by any moral questioning.Ah, yes: beauty transcends even morality, apparently. And despite the repeated suffering Oki put his wife through -- first with the affair, then with the book (he even had her type the manuscript) -- he decides this is a good idea ..... Otoko -- publicly outed as the girl described in the novel back in the day, though she never gave any interviews on the subject, or complained to Oki -- went on to become a successful painter. She agrees to meet Oki when he calls, but takes a certain amount of control: she sends her pupil, Sakami Keiko, to pick him up, and then arranges for some geishas to join them at dinner, so as to avoid being alone with him. Keiko, madly in love Otoko, clearly has her own issues -- "You have lots of hates, haven't you ?" Otoko observes -- and the thought of what Oki did and how Otoko suffered stirs up a lot of passion in her. She also has jealousy-issues: He seemed awfully depraved, but when I called your name it quieted him down immediately. He still loves you, and he has a guilty conscience. It's enough to make me jealous.She is out for revenge -- literally lusting for it, somewhat to Otoko's dismay --, and she has some ideas about how to get it. Filling in some of the details of the old affair as the story progresses, and describing the various chess games between the characters -- Otoko and Keiko, Oki and his wife, and then Keiko and everyone in Oki's family ... -- makes for an effective escalation of a sense of nemesis. There's an artificiality to it (aside from the absurdity of parts of it), but with so many artists involved that works fairly well. Eventually, the Greek tragedy à la Japonaise takes its predictable-inevitable course. The underlying lack of morality, however, is rather disturbing, regardless that Oki is merely cluelessly (and thoughtlessly) amoral. (Keiko, on the other hand, is of a pure and masochistic evil.) Admittedly, however, it is an effective contrast to the otherwise very ritualized world presented here. Kawabata's almost serene approach stands in creepy contrast to the life-destroying actions he presents; it also makes the bits of violence all the more jarringly effective. Beauty contrasts not so much with sadness but an abject sorrow, failures of love that maim and destroy. If some of the characters seem to be able to go on after a particularly devastating blow -- Otoko after the death of her child, Oki's wife after the affair -- they still harbor great hurt. Given the devastation Kawabata wreaks, Beauty and Sadness arguably does not provide sufficient depth, skimming the surface far too much of the time. But Kawabata has conceived it more like a painting (and paintings figure in the story, as both Otoko and Keiko (who have very different styles) are painters), where much has to be read into an image: reflection is left up to the reader. Unsettling and odd, but quite compelling. - M.A.Orthofer, 4 October 2010 - Return to top of the page - Beauty and Sadness:
- Return to top of the page - Japanese author Kawabata Yasunari (川端 康成) (1899-1972) was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1968. - Return to top of the page -
© 2010-2024 the complete review
|