A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
Inevitable general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : appealing period piece, an effective illustration of the forces of society at the time See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: Set around 1900, Inevitable is the story of a young (twenty-three when the book begins) divorced Dutch woman, Cornélie de Retz van Loo. Her short experience of marriage was an unhappy one, and she now believes: That's what marriage is: habit, drudgery. And now I'll tell you frankly: I think marriage is disgusting. I think that habit is disgusting.But marriage is of course what society expects and even demands. And possibly it is -- as the English title suggests -- ... inevitable. After her divorce Cornélie travels to Italy, for a change of scene (and surely to be away from the prying eyes and gossip back home in The Hague). She takes rooms at a Roman pensione, where there's an entertaining cast of seasonal boarders. Couperus captures the hotel-feel very well, from the Vatican-sponsored religious man who's put up there to try to convert those who aren't Catholic to a variety of foreigners. But sightseeing or most anything else she might spend her time doing doesn't fulfill Cornélie either; it's not what she needs. She avoids the other Dutch hotel residents -- a woman and her two daughters -- at the start, but eventually can't help but be drawn into their orbit. But it's the son, Duco van der Staal (who lives elsewhere) that eventually really captures her attention. Duco is also having a bit of trouble figuring out what life is all about, as Cornélie finds out when she asks him what he does: "Do you paint ?"Cornélie doesn't do much more either, but finds a kindred spirit in Duco, and as they spend more time together they get closer. Eventually they move in together -- maintaining some appearances, but for the most part shocking everyone. (Co-habitation was not considered acceptable in these (or most) circles.) She explains that: "after having respected convention and nevertheless having become deeply unhappy, henceforth she no longer bothered about it" -- but, of course, it's not that easy. Unfortunately, they don't have much money, and can't earn much either. Cornélie does try to put her beliefs to some use, penning a pamphlet on The Social Situation of the Divorced Woman', but she's unable and unwilling to commit fully to a reformist or feminist programme. She wants to flout convention, but she does quite enjoy the company of proper society -- which doesn't permit much flouting. Together with Duco she more or less makes do, but it is a difficult balancing act. Another pair also figure prominently in the book: American heiress Urania Hope (another guest at the pensione) and prince Virgilio 'Gilio' di Forte-Braccio, duca di San Stefano. The prince and his family are short of cash, which is how he is set up with Urania -- and though Cornélie warns the girl, Urania can't help herself and ties the knot with the golddigger. He's nice and amiable enough -- but he also has an eye on Cornélie ..... Cornélie isn't torn between convention and love; the choice is obvious to her, it's Duco. But the financial strain gets to be considerable. Cornélie even takes a job -- and thus finds herself in the last position she wants to be in: She longed for Rome, for the studio, for Duco, for independence, love, happiness. She had had everything, but had not been allowed to stay. She had been forced back into pretence, convention, the disgusting comedy of life. It surrounded her like a great lie, more glittering than in The Hague, but even falser, more impudent, more perverse.And there's another shock to the system, when she runs into her former husband again. It's an interesting choice Couperus then makes: inevitability conquers all, society (and its norms) overwhelms the individual and free choice. Cornélie feels compelled, even as she does not feel all those things she was able to revel in: It was as it was. In her blood she was not a woman for many: in her blood she was all wife, spouse, mate. In her flesh, in her blood she was the wife of the man who had been her husband, she was his wife, even without love.It's an odd moral: for all the passion and all the flouting of convention and even Cornélie's forays into feminism, the novel takes a surprisingly conservative turn, as if Couperus believed the times were not quite ready for the independence Cornélie shows (but can't completely commit to). Her youth excuses some of it, and Couperus warned the reader almost from the beginning: This woman was a child of her time but particularly of her environment, which was why she was so immature: conflict against conflict, a balance of contradiction, which might be either her downfall or her salvation, but was certainly her fate.And so it is a clever novel of the times, exposing the forces at work on the (female) individual -- what she must fight against, and why she may ultimately not be able to assert herself (or at least her independence). Together with the very fine character-portraits and good pacing it makes for an appealing enough read -- though it is very much a book of its time. - Return to top of the page - Inevitable:
- Return to top of the page - Dutch author Louis Couperus lived 1863 to 1923. - Return to top of the page -
© 2006-2021 the complete review
|