A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : good detail-work; the big picture too messy and underdeveloped See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot goes down pretty easy, most of the way.
Its narrative alternating between three young characters before converging, Shafer nicely captures how each of their lives -- already teetering, as adulthood hasn't quite gone the way they might have wished -- suddenly well and truly flounders.
In fact, he's much better with the floundering than when the characters transition to being purpose-driven; the female lead, Leila Majnoun, an Iranian-American working for a ("bush-league") NGO, Helping Hand, is the first on a mission (when her family is drawn into some trouble she gets herself into she fixates on helping her father out of a jam), and becomes too defined by that; the two males, former Harvard classmates and friends Leo Crane and Mark Deveraux, are left bumbling about much longer, in the far more convincing (though admittedly at times also enervating -- get it together already, guys ...) parts of the novel.
control seventy percent of the bandwidth in Asia, all the newspapers in contentious geopolitical zones, and the major pharmaceuticals. They control Sine, Skype, Facebook, all of that. They own forests and water basins and silica mines and railroads and airports. They have shareholders in the secret services of most of the nations in the world.Etc. Of course, where there are such bad guys, there are also good guys, trying to take them down, and Leila and then Leo and Mark are drawn into that circle. A network, actually: We're called Dear Diary. We do not oppose, exactly, but we're hoping to move past the nation-state thing.And they certainly are opposed to the Committee, and find themselves at odds and at war with them. Shafer has a lot of fun with some of this. Dear Diary play the spy game very well, from fake identities (Leila becomes 'Lola Montes') to all sorts of switching-out tricks, but the Committee also has many resources, and seems constantly hot on their heels. There's good techno-thriller fun along the way -- but Shafer rather overextends himself here. Really overextends himself. He pretty much lost me when they pulled out the computers that: "don't need to be plugged in, although they do need to be watered and given sunlight", as well as the concept of a "connectivity" that sort of plugs individuals into a larger consciousness ("We call it the Common Language, but no one has a clue how to use it yet, or what to do with it") ... sheesh. They techno-conspiracy aspect of the novel ("A secret oligarchy has rigged the system past the point of its being correctable by legal political means") is cartoonishly over the top. The stakes are almost too high -- except that the whole set-up, as Shafer sets it up (barely sketched out), is hard to take seriously. And, indeed, Shafer is much more comfortable on ground level, with his three main characters. (Only one of them is lost in his grand design: spacey man-child Leo turns out to have more to him than anyone realized, and you almost expect the halo to appear around his head by the end. On the other hand, that does lead to one of the novel's best lines (in a novel that, by the way, is full of good ones) the unlikely and yet, at that point, beautifully romantic line: "I'm your square root". But it feels a bit forced too, Shafer setting all this up for that line; the Leo in the child-care center was a much more convincing and sympathetic human figure.) It's striking how good much of the novel is on that ground level. Shafer has a great ear, and a really nice touch with the observations -- just slightly off-kilter. Yes, he packs it on too thick at times, entranced by his writing and forgetting about moving the plot forward -- making clear yet again how this whole conspiracy nonsense isn't really his main concern. He surprises in nice ways on the detail-level too -- there's a pony, for example: perfect. The writing is consistently excellent -- "the cabin was about the coolest thing ever, hand-hewn and hobbity" -- with only the occasional jarring misstep: She read the Irish Times, because she'd never read it before and because it was one of those gigantic broadsheets you need to have upper-body strength to hold upright.(Why, why the hyperbole ? How gigantic can a broadsheet -- still all paper, by the way -- be ? And, disappointingly, the Irish Times isn't even a particularly outsized one.) So Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is, especially on the page-by-page level, very good reading. But its ambition -- and the lack of ambition with that ambition, not making nearly enough of almost any of it -- make for a read that winds up being rather unsatisfying. Shafer posits a conspiracy of incredible, world-encompassing size and scope -- and a countervailing force that has a similarly incredible reach -- but it's either silly (the Dear Diary stuff) or a big yawn (the darker Committee plans). And, for those who do care about this clash of cultures and technologies, Shafer also takes the unusual step in a techno-thriller of leaving off at an inconclusive point. (This seems fine -- the whole idea seemed so silly it's better just not to deal with what happens next -- but surely will disappoint readers hoping for a definitive outcome and some closure.) So Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is an odd piece of work. Very good writing, very good stories (mainly on the personal level), wrapped in an underbaked comic-strip-story. - M.A.Orthofer, 6 August 2014 - Return to top of the page - Whiskey Tango Foxtrot:
- Return to top of the page - David Shafer is an American author and journalist. - Return to top of the page -
© 2014-2015 the complete review
|