A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Redeeming the Kamasutra general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : entertaining and revealing Kamasutra-readings See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Several of the seven chapters in Redeeming the Kamasutra are based on previous work by Doniger, but in revised ("much revised", she emphasizes in some cases) and refashioned versions, and now loosely fitted together as a more unified work.
Her ambition is clear from the title -- a reaction, too, in part, as she admits in her introduction, to: "the rise of a wave of puritanical censorship in India in the past decade".
But the work she wants to redeem isn't exactly the salacious version readers often have in mind when they hear the title Kamasutra -- and this is another of her goals in this book: to remind readers about the exact nature of the work: yes, there's a lot of sex, but the dubious Richard F. Burton translation definitely gives the wrong impression.
(Doniger of course also set out to right that impression with her own translation (with Sudhir Kakar) of the Kamasutra (2002, Oxford University Press); see also A.N.D.Haksar's recent translation of the Kama Sutra.)
The Kamasutra is closely based upon the Arthashastra, and this connection strongly influences the worldview of the Kamasutra.This introduction to the less well-known Arthashastra, and its influences on Vatsyayana is particularly interesting, Doniger suggesting that while the "Arthashastra is often said to be Machiavellian" that doesn't begin to describe it, as Kautilya (the author the work is ascribed to): "makes Machiavelli look like Mother Teresa". A chapter on 'Women in the Kamasutra' helpfully considers the text (and advice) from a female perspective -- with Doniger suggesting even: "Vatsyayana also knew about the G-spot". And among her observations: He tells the man how to recognize when a woman has reached a climax -- or, perhaps, if we assume (as I think we should) that the text is intended for women, too, he is telling the woman how to fake itWhile the thoroughness of the textual analysis, and the historical and cultural understanding Doniger brings to her discussion impress, Redeeming the Kamasutra is also particularly enjoyable for a lightness in tone and the humor that she brings to her writing. Whether discussing sexual positions, such as the so-called missionary position -- "The Kamasutra mentions this position briefly, but without enthusiasm" -- or discussing genital size (where she offers also the parenthetical mention: "We will simply note, in passing, the racist and Orientalist aspects of penis envy") she covers a lot of ground succinctly, sharply, and often very amusingly. Redeeming the Kamasutra is a scholarly but very accessible work. It isn't truly just an 'introduction to the Kamasutra' -- Doniger gives a good overview, but also only focuses on some specifics: in redeeming the Kamasutra she assumes some familiarity with it, its history, and how it has been viewed/read. Informative, her study is also a lot of fun -- Doniger impressively providing lots of scholarship but never falling into the dryly academic. Certainly of interest to anyone interested in the Kamasutra (anyone who doesn't (want to) think of/see it solely as a sex manual, that is). - M.A.Orthofer, 9 March 2016 - Return to top of the page - Redeeming the Kamasutra:
- Return to top of the page - American scholar Wendy Doniger teaches at the University of Chicago. She was born in 1940. - Return to top of the page -
© 2016-2023 the complete review
|