A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Age of Reason general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B- : chatty, and rather overfull with indecisiveness See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
The Age of Reason is set in Paris in 1938.
The Spanish Civil War is still being fought, but it's an isolated conflict; the threat of war in the rest of Europe looms larger now after the Austrian Anschluß, but does not feel immediate yet.
I'm getting old. Here I am, lounging in a chair, committed to my present life right up to the ears and believing in nothing.The war in Spain tempts him -- but only in the most abstract way: he doesn't have anywhere near the conviction to really have a go at something like that. Similarly, he can't be bothered to join a cause like the Communist Party. He's not a man of action, and he's not a joiner -- or, arguably, true believer, as he's not a man of true convictions, either. One of the people Mathieu hits up for money is his older brother, Jacques, who went through his own dissolute stage ("he had dallied with surrealism", among other things) but now is entirely prim and proper. He married good money and bought himself into a law practice -- and he pegs Mathieu just right: you condemn capitalist society, and yet you are an official in that society; you display an abstract sympathy with Communists, but you take care not to commit yourself, you have never voted. You despise the bourgeois class, and yet you are bourgeois, son and brother of a bourgeois, and you live like a bourgeois.And, he tells his brother: "You have attained the age of reason, Mathieu, you have attained the age of reason, or you ought to have done so". But: "Pah !", said Mathieu. "Your age of reason is the age of resignation, and I've no use for it."On and on it goes, as Mathieu reëvaluates his life, his situation, and his relationship with Marcelle. He finds a reliable but pricey abortionist, but that just increases the time-pressure (the doctor is headed abroad shortly) -- and, of course, that desperate hunt for the money helps keep his mind off the real questions he should be facing, but which he doesn't seem very comfortable entertaining. Should he marry her ? Should he even stay with her, in this comfortable rut of a relationship ? Does she want the child ? (It's not a question he asks himself -- or her -- very hard .....) But everything works out, in a way. The Marcelle situation resolves itself in a manner that largely absolves Mathieu from any sort of responsibility (though that resolution comes with one big surprise, as one of the characters makes another revelation that upends things quite a bit, too -- and suggests that maybe Marcelle's best interests are not best served by this particular outcome). "But you're free now", Mathieu is told when all is said and done -- but he's not satisfied, of course: "Pah !" he responds. With some resignation he admits he's reached 'the age of reason' (so the novel's closing lines) -- but it's not a happy place for him. For a philosophy professor, Mathieu doesn't do much philosophizing, beyond on a very basic level; indeed, there's very little sense of him as either teacher or philosopher at any point in the novel (and he certainly never appears in an actual classroom). The Age of Reason is a very chatty novel, but more on the chit than profound level. Yes, admirably Sartre tries to show, rather than tell -- but he doesn't quite show enough of, or look deeply enough into any of the characters for his fiction to attain much gravity. The Age of Reason is also a surprisingly indecisive novel: almost none of the characters act decisively. They all hem and haw and vacillate at various points. Typically, one character bundles his cats in a basket and goes off to drown them. It's a horrible thing to contemplate, but Sartre contemplates it -- but without following through. Sorry: if you're going to propose something like that, you better see it through. Sartre shows how difficult it can be to take charge of one's own life -- to accept that one has the responsibilities that come with 'the age of reason' -- and none of his characters achieve it in this volume. (Yes, some do, in the end act, rather decisively -- but it's questionable that they've really thought things through properly; the 'solution' to the Marcelle situation, specifically, sounds like a catastrophe waiting to happen.) The Age of Reason is the first volume in a trilogy, and that work should presumably be judged as a whole; nevertheless, it's not a great start. A philosophical, meandering novel, it includes some inspired ideas and episodes, but is rather middling fiction. Sartre mistakes movement -- Mathieu is almost constantly on the go -- for real action, and there's just not enough depth to his characters, in the way they are presented. Of some -- but decidedly limited -- interest. - M.A.Orthofer, 29 May 2013 - Return to top of the page - The Age of Reason:
- Return to top of the page - French author and philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) was awarded (and declined) the 1964 Nobel Prize in Literature. - Return to top of the page -
© 2013-2023 the complete review
|