A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
My Unwritten Books general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
A- : great idea, and covers most of the familiar Steiner-bases See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
In My Unwritten Books George Steiner describes seven book-ideas that never came to fruition, for a variety of reasons.
One imagines there are, in fact, many more unwritten books and proposals in the Steiner-drawers, but these seven make for a neat summa of his life and interests, a 'best of' collection, in a way, that allows Steiner to riff on many of his favourite pre-occupations but also to condense them to about thirty pages each.
It makes for an interesting collection, even as it raises more questions than it answers.
This must be an erroneous shibboleth. But is it ?The first unwritten book he describes is a volume for Frank Kermode's 'Modern Masters' series, for which Steiner wanted to write about the scholar behind the mammoth Science and Civilization in China (and much more), Joseph Needham. It's no surprise that Steiner is drawn to the man: "In range, in fruitfulness, Needham stands with Voltaire and Goethe", and Steiner has always had a thing for these prolific, boundary-breaking, connexion-making polymaths. And much of Needham's expertise was in areas that Steiner's -- himself quite far-reaching in his pursuits -- didn't always reach; certainly, Steiner turned to him for his understanding of China -- and, for example, that vexing question why the Chinese, who made many of the great scientific discoveries were unable (or unwilling) to capitalize on them, and why the scientific revolution only came about centuries later, in western Europe. Steiner is also fascinated by Science and Civilization in China itself, the type of encyclopaedic and all-consuming work that he himself never wrote but that surely also tempted him. He sees this kind of work as a genre all its own, Burton's The Anatomy of Melancholy among the earliest examples. And, in a nice creative stroke, suggests the work that is most comparable to Needham's magnum opus is ... Marcel Proust's multi-volume saga. The second essay moves on to envy, including scholarly envy of the highest genius. The example Steiner uses, in the essay entitled 'Invidia', is that of the largely forgotten Cecco d'Ascoli, "a true predecessor to Giordano Bruno and Galileo" who (along with his works) was burned -- at the same time as he presumably knew Dante's work was on its way to achieving immortality. Steiner's personal experiences -- working beside geniuses at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study, and describing scenes such as "J.Robert Oppenheimer fling at a junior physicist the demand: 'You are so young and already you have done so little.'" -- add a nice touch -- as does the concluding explanation of why he didn't write a full-scale work on the subject: "it came too near the bone." In 'The Tongues of Eros' Steiner tackles sex -- and, in particular the interplay of language and sex. Hence the opening lines: What is the sexual life of a deaf-mute ? To what incitements and cadence does he or she masturbate ?This is perhaps not a question many people have asked themselves, but Steiner makes an interesting case for the connexion between language and sex -- and it's hard not to admire someone to whom it would occur to wonder: "How enriching it might be to have nightmares or wet dreams in, say, Albanian." Here the personal perhaps isn't quite as necessary: good for him that he can say: "I have been privileged to speak and make love in four languages", but no one needs to know that: In Tulsa, Oklahoma, my glorious ebony partner hummed at me: "Baby, you haven't seen anything yet."Writing about sex is hard, and the mix of theoretical and practical here further muddies the waters -- and makes it hard to read without smirking. Suddenly everything sounds like, at best, a double-entendre: "Every human tongue challenges reality in its own unique manner" ..... Yes, there's definite potential in the subject-matter -- but it would have been a hard book to find the proper tone for. In 'Zion' Steiner explores identity-issues, specifically the question of Jewish identity. Steiner has addressed this subject before, and notes again the remarkable success Jews have had in particular fields -- from chess to the sciences. "Some primal force is at work", he's led to think, but he has no real explanations either. Like 'The Tongues of Eros' this is a fairly clearly sketched-out piece, touching on the major issues and questions: the book it might have been in miniature, even if here more is in the form of the questions that need be asked than the answers to them. In 'School Terms' Steiner turns to education, the unwritten book a comparative study of different school systems -- something Steiner, who has taught in several different systems and been exposed to others, would have been well-qualified to do. The piece allows him to note the weaknesses and strengths of a variety of systems , and the rapid change in modern education. He's not sure what is most needed, but he expresses his disappointment at falling standards and calls for a basic sort of literacy in the important fields, which he sees as a necessary foundation. 'Of Man and Beast' looks at man and animals, a connexion he argues is still a very close one. From writing about his family's pet dogs to more unsettling claims such as: "Those who have had sex with an animal are in congress with their own biological and psychosomatic past", he covers a lot of the bases here too. There are interesting questions raised here too, but this is perhaps the one out of the seven that is least missed as a full-fledged book. Finally, in 'Begging the Question' he turns to the philosophical again, in particular the question of his politics -- as he notes that he has never been politically active, and has always stayed more or less removed from that sphere. My Unwritten Books is a condensed Steiner-collection -- and a great introduction to the man and his many varied thoughts. A life-long teacher it does what he often did best: offer food for thought. It's crammed with ideas, with enough to debate and ponder for many lifetimes, and one of the things he manages is to present it in such a way that every reader can take just as much as they want from it: read it simply for the entertainment value, or underline every other line and discuss each of the many questions with anyone you can get to listen. (The questions and ideas are often so provocative that it shouldn't be a problem finding others to engage in debate with). It's the connexions -- Steiner's own ability to bring in literary, philosophical, scientific, mathematical, musical, and many other examples -- that make the book particularly lively. The personal experiences are a nice touch too, though not always: we could have done without the 'glorious ebony partner' or the dogs. Enjoyable and very thought-provoking, My Unwritten Books is well worthwhile. - Return to top of the page - My Unwritten Books:
- Return to top of the page - George Steiner, born in 1929, is one of the foremost intellectuals of our time. A professor at Cambridge and Geneva, he is the author of numerous books. - Return to top of the page -
© 2007-2017 the complete review
|