A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
A Few Stout Individuals general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B- : some clever and amusing parts, and affecting, but doesn't properly come to grips with all the material See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: The title of A Few Stout Individuals is taken from Emerson, as quoted by Guare: What is history ? No more than the biographies of a few stout individuals.(Reviewer John Simon points out that: "Emerson actually calls them a few 'stout and earnest persons' ".) The subject of the play is one of the first (and most successful) celebrity memoirs, former American president Ulysses S. Grant's two-volume autobiography, commissioned and published by an enterprising Samuel Clemens (a.k.a. Mark Twain). The play is in two acts, set three weeks apart in 1885, as Grant tries to pen his memoirs while besieged by creditors and kept from his work by all manner of distractions, disturbances, and irritants -- from the cancer killing him to his delirious visions of the Emperor of Japan to a less than helpful family and a distinctly unhelpful amanuensis. Clemens is also on the scene, dismayed at how things are going (and worried about his investment -- and all those wonderful potential profits, about to go up in smoke). Guare begins things fairly cleverly, the Emperor of Japan and wife appearing before Grant. He had met them on a visit to Japan. As Guare notes in his Preface: "Grant shone in Japan. This could possibly have been the happiest Grant and his wife ever were." Things are less rosy in New York in 1885: Grant hasn't gotten very far with the book -- and seems in no condition to work, as for example, his wife spritzes him up with brandy (he can't drink because of the cancer in his mouth) and keeps him going with a variety of other drugs ("The morphine, the cannabis, the hydrochlorate of cocaine -- thank God we're living today", Mrs. G says). Meanwhile the appointed scribe, Adam Badeau, is himself a wannabe biographer and has his own ideas about what the book should look like -- much to Clemens' dismay, since it is exactly Grant's voice that he's after (and on which he knows the success of the project depends). And there's no money in the house (except in Clemens' rapidly emptying wallet). Guare sets a scene in which the writing of anything coherent -- much less the two volumes Clemens needs -- looks impossible. The frenzy and desperation are well-conveyed -- though a few of the touches (especially sculptor Karl Gerhardt, ever ready at the door and asking "Is it time ?" far too often) are quite annoying. The material is factual, but Guare moves too close to farce with the continuing flow of people with demands, requests, and ideas -- including ne'er-do-well son Buck, who was responsible for Grant's financial ruin. Clemens provides a rational, stable figure in this mess -- wondering all the while what he got himself into: It all seemed so easy. Hire the general to write his memoirs. Sell a copy to every veteran. What could go wrong ?But even Clemens doesn't provide enough of a balance in the end. The play also looks at other issues, as Guare has grander things in mind too, leading to such incongruous pronouncements as Clemens telling Grant: What separates us from the beasts is memory, but the paradox is that memory separates us, each from the other. Until we share that memory, we are truly alone. That is the purpose of art, of history, of love. If you share your unique memory with the world, you will give America its memory. The war will be truly over. We will finally become a nation with one memory -- and with that memory, we will never fight a war again.It's a grand speech, but in this play it also sticks out like a sore thumb. Some of the literary-historical issues are of interest -- particularly how Cold Harbor is treated (Grant famously only wrote two lines about those events), which Guare handles quite well. But this too forces the play to move uneasily from the comic (or at least attempted comic) to the serious. There's a decent summing up in the end (including an amusing scene as Grant asks the Emperor of Japan whether he is remembered), but it's more of literary-historical interest than theatrically effective. (Grant's memoirs proved to be an incredible success: Clemens notes that: "At one time, one out of every three families in America owned a copy".) A Few Stout Individuals is of some interest, and there is entertainment value here, but it doesn't entirely convince -- too uncertain of what it wants to be, and how to present the material. But it's a neat story, and there are a number of characters of interest: the drugged and largely confused Grant is underwhelming, but others -- Clemens, Badeau, and then Harrison -- are quite successful. - Return to top of the page - Reviews: Ulysses S. Grant:
- Return to top of the page - American author John Guare was born in 1938. He has written numerous acclaimed plays, as well as several screenplays. - Return to top of the page -
© 2003-2010 the complete review
|