A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Die Denunziantin general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : a fascinating if problematic work, very well editorially presented See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: [Note: Die Denunziantin has not been translated into English yet. All translations of quotes are my own.]
Die Denunziantin -- 'The Informer', or, literally, 'the denouncer' -- centers on East German high school senior Eva Hennig, and takes place in her final school term, in 1951.
Brigitte Reimann began writing the novel -- her first -- in 1952, but was unsuccessful in getting it published; she re-worked the manuscript several times -- closely documented in this excellent edition --, with the fourth, very different (and fragmentary) version eventually published as Wenn die Stunde ist, zu sprechen .., in Das Mädchen auf der Lotosblume.
(Elements of the story remain, and Eva Hennig is the protagonist, but that work differs markedly from Die Denunziantin.)
Du bist mächtig für ,Wirkung‘ oder was du so nennst. Schlag auf Schlag willst du hinsetzen. Du willst blenden, Eva.Briefly, Eva even gets along with Sehning -- he has a way about him, she certainly has to grant him that, too -- but things come to a head when he gives her his opinion about the play she wants to put on. He wonders -- in 1951 ! -- if there hasn't been enough of this reminding everyone of the horrors of the Nazi time, and whether it isn't long time to move past all that. And he hits too close to home when he says that activities of the (then-)illegal anti-fascists opposing the Nazis served little purpose. Since Eva's father was killed by the Nazis for his activities, she isn't very open to this argument -- and off she goes, to more formally denounce Sehning to the school director (who, having been imprisoned with Eva's father, in both prison and a concentration camp, is certainly sympathetic). Eva's denunciation does not go over well among her classmates, who think she's taking things much too far. Nevertheless, the director immediately calls in a commission to consider the case. Since Sehning never really expressed himself -- then or otherwise -- in a manner that could clearly be construed as undermining the East German project or revealing truly reactionary tendencies there's ultimately not much the commission can do. Sehning is a snake, but a careful one who isn't so easily caught out; one commission member supports Eva's instincts -- they are little more than that -- but ultimately even the school director has to side with those agreeing that there's no firing offence here. (Eva holds this against the director for quite a while.) While a few stray friends remain supportive, on the whole Eva is now loathed by her classmates -- which she finds tough to take. Reimann mentions her keeping a diary earlier, but now even switches for a bit longer to entries from it, a first-person perspective of her suffering. She doesn't doubt that she is right, but the cost is a difficult one for her to bear. Despite her frustrations about Klaus not siding with her -- and then moving his seat from beside hers, and starting to go out with a new girl -- she still has some lingering feelings for him. Oh so briefly, Eva acts out, neglecting her schoolwork and going out dancing and letting herself be pawed by another fellow, but she comes to her senses very quickly, cutting off the plunge of becoming a tramp before things get out of hand. She takes her studies seriously again and, realizing she has let everyone down by neglecting her duties in preparing the play-production, throws herself wholeheartedly into that -- though the date of the performance has to be postponed. She doesn't easily win over her classmates, but those helping her with the play are a good start, and she begins to win over some of the others through her actions as well -- including challenging their Russian teacher and demanding that the scores for a recent test that many of her classmates did poorly on -- she, of course, did well -- be stricken, telling the teacher to his face that he is the one who failed his students by not preparing them properly. (He takes the path of least resistance and agrees.) The great triumph, of course, then comes with the performance of the play -- an eye-opener that leads her classmates to realize her original denunciation of Sehning was, in fact, entirely valid. (The performance, in front of an invited audience that included a horde of war orphans, of course pushed all the right buttons.) A cocky Sehning then thinks he still has the class in hand, but shows too much of his true colors when he teaches some Rudyard Kipling poems and speaks admiringly about the healthy competition among the capitalist nations and bemoans how the Germans were always too late with their colonizing efforts. Yes, he definitely gets too big for his britches, and before he knows it, the tide has turned and he has fled the scene and tendered his resignation. (No worries -- he goes, just like Klaus does, where he belongs: to the decadent West.) Yes, everything goes well -- including Eva getting her place at film school, to which she will head in the fall. (Other than the locale -- Reimann has Eva set to study in Berlin -- this too mirrors Reimann's own path; amusingly, she only lasted a few days at drama school in Weimar, turning instead to training as a teacher.) With its high school setting and teenage main characters, there's something of the YA novel to Die Denunziantin. This excellent edition includes a close comparison of the four different versions -- this one the first (and, along with the third, the only complete one) -- and among the early editorial advice she got was to polish the language, as she had her characters speak like the youth of the day; this was terrible advice and presumably fatal for the following versions; Reimann had a good ear, and most of the youths of Die Denunziantin feel authentic. The one peculiar stand-out is, of course the Reimann-stand-in Eva; as editor Kristina Stella notes, the novel was basically unpublishable in this form because the character was too individualistic -- though of course for actual readers that's the main charm of the novel. This forceful bundle of energy and emotion dominates everything around her -- and, because the novel is of course one of self-reflection and -analysis, the Eva character is by far the most compelling. But it's an odd contrast with much of the rest of the novel. The other piece of editorial advice she got early on was not to bring up the charge of denouncer so early; the editor has a point here -- but then the novel is titled Die Denunziantin, so you can sort of see how Reimann wanted to make a big deal out of that. That is, of course, also the big problem with the novel which, cut to its essence, is absolutely terrible in its message. Yes, Sehning is a snake, and a reactionary imperialist, and his subtle, roundabout maybe-indoctrination of his students might be problematic -- but when Eva first accuses him she really has nothing on him except her gut feeling. Nevertheless, she is immediately taken very seriously, and Sehning, in essence, tried (and essentially absolved, since there is nothing on him ...). As remarkable and appealing as Eva is, she's also following the Stalin, Nazi, or Khmer Rouge playbook in allowing for lives to be potentially completed upended or outright destroyed on the flimsiest of evidence. This is not good. In fact, this is terrible. Un(der)founded denunciations were a dime a dozen in that society, of course, -- and usually opportunistic rather than, as here, honestly ideologically driven, but Eva is no model here (and the fact that she is, in fact, right shouldn't absolve her; in fact, it just muddies the message further). Presumably, Reimann was working through some things of her own here, and while the German publishers who declined to publish the novel mostly did so for other reasons, one has to admit that this would have been a problematic text to put out there. (That the German publishers were willing to engage with author and text to the extent they did speaks for her talent, which bubbles through all over: Die Denunziantin is a rough work by a young author, but she altready showed her chops here; it's obvious she was a very, very promising writer.) This edition, presenting the complete first version of the text, as well as then a history of its (and its successors) non-publication (until Wenn die Stunde ist, zu sprechen .., the unfinished fourth version) and pointing out and showing (often significant) textual changes, is excellent. We see what Reimann wrestles with in her writing, trying to balance an aim to please with a need to remain true to herself; clearly, the first is the best of the four versions (though the very different last one is of interest too). A valuable piece of literary-historical documentation, this edition of Die Denunziantin is an impressive package. Die Denunziantin is, to put it mildly, a problematic -- because, fundamentally, fanatic -- text, but it's a fascinating and revealing piece of Reimann's œuvre, and a remarkable document of the German Democratic Republic in its earliest days (with, in its supplemental material, some interesting insight into the literary and publishing scene of the times). - M.A.Orthofer, 20 March 2023 - Return to top of the page - Die Denunziantin:
- Return to top of the page - East German author Brigitte Reimann lived 1933 to 1973. - Return to top of the page -
© 2023 the complete review
|