A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: |
Briefwechsel general information | our review | links | about the authors
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : interesting and informative, if somewhat specialized correspondence See our review for fuller assessment. The complete review's Review: In a 1973 letter to Imre Lakatos Paul Feyerabend writes: I am, or rather, I was not aware that all my letters are filed away for HISTORY. Hans Albert does this -- as a matter of fact his cellar is full of letters from you, John, Habermas, Sir Karl, me and others and it was very amusing to read my letters of five, six years ago. I did not recognize myself at all.Some of the correspondence -- that from the years 1966 to 1971 -- between Albert and Feyerabend is published in this useful, if somewhat limited volume. A fascinating complement to the Feyerabend-Lakatos letters from a roughly similar period (1968-74) published in For and Against Method (see our review), it offers a somewhat different perspective on the tumultuous period at Berkeley, as well as the writing of Feyerabend's classic, Against Method. Albert, a more staunch Popper follower than Lakatos, and with a professional focus outside of the philosophy of science, makes for a different conversation partner for Feyerabend. Many of these letters are more substantial in their philosophical arguments than in the Lakatos-Feyerabend correspondence. Amusingly, however, many of the same episodes and events are again revisited and echoed, giving a fairly full picture of Feyerabend's life in those times. Among the more interesting points in the correspondence is the greater tolerance for Hegel Feyerabend expresses, as well as the more German focus (talk about the revolutionary times focussing more on Cohn-Bendit, for example, than in the Lakatos correspondence, where the LSE's own woes are naturally more at the fore). Feyerabend's discussion of the "Stinkbombe" (stink-bomb), as he fondly refers to Against Method here, is also valuable, as he is not so directly concerned with Lakatos' counterarguments when writing to Albert. There are the usual humorous titbits, including an excellent multi-Popper-caricature (with subscript-Poppers -- 0 through 5 -- as Lakatos would have them). Feyerabend also gives more insight into his intellectual forebears and heroes, always half-serious: Hegel -- well, nimm das nicht so ernst, mein Held ist Brecht und Johnny Carson.Feyerabend even manages some cuneiform curses (directed, naturally, against Popper). Useful, interesting documentation, this volume helps illuminate more of Feyerabend's life and thought. Regrettably the volume only covers a very limited period of time, and one that is (regarding Feyerabend) fairly well documented. Hopefully, more will eventually be forthcoming. - Return to top of the page - Reviews:
- Return to top of the page - Paul K. Feyerabend: - Return to top of the page -
© 1999-2010 the complete review
|