A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: |
Conquest of Abundance general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : interesting, multi-faceted approach to the idea (and consequences) of abstraction See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Paul Feyerabend died in 1994, before he could complete the book he was then working on, Conquest of Abundance (the working title he mentions in his autobiography, Killing Time (see our review), and which has been kept for this volume).
Bert Terpstra undertook the challenging job of taking Feyerabend's unfinished manuscript and shaping this volume out of it.
Given Feyerabend's penchant for reworking material this was no small task.
Terpstra has, however, done an excellent job.
The book is intended to show how specialists and common people reduce the abundance that surrounds and confuses them, and the consequences of their actions.It is a book on "the topic of reality". The subtitle suggests the direction in which Feyerabend is leaning -- it is poor abstraction versus "the richness of being". Feyerabend shows that there has long been a tendency towards abstraction, an inevitable consequence of trying to understand any subject. From the ancient Greeks to modern physicists specifically the search for an understanding of reality has led to abstraction. Feyerabend argues that this process is a problematic one, in that abstraction fails to encompass the true diversity and richness of reality. Abstraction, though useful to a certain extent, easily becomes a simplification that impoverishes. The manuscript Conquest of Abundance contains four chapters and an interlude. The first three chapters describe "two different ways in which the distinction between appearance and reality was introduced." The examples are from ancient Greece -- centering around Achilles, Xenophanes, and Parmenides. The interlude is "On the Ambiguity of Interpretation." The fourth chapter discusses the famous example of Brunelleschi and the invention of perspective, to illustrate "problems of reality and cultural change." Feyerabend's arguments and examples are lucid and interesting, and the first chapter on Achilles particularly effective. His main argument is fairly well presented, as are some of the further consequences he elaborates on -- so, for example, the care that must be taken in considering logic in different settings (where the underlying terms and concepts must be understood differently). The twelve essays that make up the second half of the book are generally variations on his theme, covering some of the same territory while also offering additional material that sheds light on Feyerabend's central argument. Some of these essays offer other perspectives and help explain Feyerabend's thinking more fully. A 1991 essay Ethics as a Measure of Scientific Truth (Comments on Fang Lizhi's Philosophy of Science) is a useful and more political statement of the dangers Feyerabend sees in how science is perceived and supported. Various essays deal with the problems and issues arising from quantum theory (with its own ideas of "reality"). The last essay is a typically Feyerabendian criticism of an appeal signed by various eminent philosophers and scientists calling for governments to give greater support to the study of philosophy. Feyerabend's refreshing and often contrarian attitude almost always make for an interesting read. His arguments here are not entirely as radical as in some of his earlier work (the notion of "anything goes"), but do offer an interesting challenge to the enthusiastic embrace of abstraction. Feyerabend's inclusiveness and willingness to consider other ideas, opinions, cultures, approaches, and attitudes is salutary. Certainly, his argument for the richness of being and of actual experience (rather than abstracted reality) should be kept in mind, a welcome counterweight to the prevailing attitude and approach in so much of human life. Many of Feyerabend's works are a similar jumble of essays, making his point from all directions. In this Conquest of Abundance seems almost typical. It is, unfortunately, not complete as Feyerabend might have wanted it, but it is still a convincing, fascinating document. (And given how prone Feyerabend was to changing even his published work -- see the different editions of Against Method, for example -- expecting a definitive version would probably be unrealistic in any case.) Conquest of Abundance is a fitting testament to a fascinating philosopher. Recommended. - Return to top of the page - Conquest of Abundance:
- Return to top of the page - Paul K. Feyerabend was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1924. He received his Ph.D. in 1951, and went on to study at the London School of Economics. From 1958 to 1990 he was a lecturer and then professor at the University of California at Berkeley, while also teaching at numerous other academic institutions. The author of such works as Against Method and Science in a Free Society he was among the most influential philosophers of the second half of the 20th century. He died in 1994. - Return to top of the page -
© 2000-2010 the complete review
|