A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
I Burn Paris general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : fascinating as a document of the times; curious piece of political fiction See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
I Burn Paris is a product of Europe in the 1920s and the economic and political turmoil of those times across the continent, and the world.
While largely set in Paris, the city here is a mirror of the global situation, with two of the significant representative characters Chinese and American respectively.
(The publishing history of the novel already suggests its broad scope and specific appeal: though written by a Pole, it was first serialized in a French newspaper, and became a bestseller in the Soviet Union (where the author spent the last decade or so of his life).)
Then -- faces, factories, cities ... image after image, like a high-speed film. No way to retain it all. Groups, meetings, strikes, demonstrations, prisons. The flesh on his heels stripped to the bone. Two months in the slammer. Two death sentences. Two jailbreaks.P'an Tsiang-kuei is sent to study in Europe, where he is able to familiarize himself first-hand with the ideologies and philosophies that he feels have been undermining China. Eventually, too, he feels confident in concluding: Europe is dying in its last convulsive spasms. No cordon sanitaire will save it. The plague will surge unstoppably across the whole of the continent when its done with Paris. To tell the truth, its meddling in our age-old conflict is entirely superfluous.Yet the actual plague remains largely localized: walled off and quarantined from the rest of the world, Paris itself becomes a microcosm of potential: an independent Chinese republic is established in the Quartier Latin, the Jewish population claims their own piece of land as well, expelling all the (conveniently apathetic) Christians from it, and the workers' populations of Belleville and Ménilmontant declare: "their territories an autonomous Soviet Republic". Eventually, Paris is carved up into "over a dozen tiny states". Among those getting stuck in plagued Paris is a good, old-fashioned American capitalist, too: "David Lingslay, king of an American metal trust, owner of fourteen major newspapers". With: "the whole of the United States naval fleet" in the palm of his hand, Lingslay is drawn into a grand escape plan to get a Jewish contingent to America (a part of the novel where later history is rather uncomfortably prefigured). Unfortunately (or not), the plans don't pan out: Paris-as-global-microcosm goes remarkably badly; as do attempts at escape. Aside from the deadly plague itself, the various mini-states with their competing ideologies and interests don't manage to get along, and all in all it's pretty much a disaster. Yet out of complete destruction perhaps, like the phoenix, the grand can rise from the ashes ? That's how Jasieński sees it. He finds redemption and potential in the sole surviving class and elements -- and they actually manage to get their act together (buying some time through a ruse that continues to keep pernicious outside influences at bay). Yes, I Burn Paris actually is optimistically utopian -- even if the price for the new society is very high: Paris proper isn't exactly burnt to the ground, but the vast majority of Parisians ... well, very few get to see and enjoy the promised (or newly-founded) land. It is surely this short, last third of the novel, suggesting that a better world is possible (and suggesting some of what must or should be done to reach it) that made I Burn Paris palatable to the Soviet authorities (and, no doubt, played a major role in getting Jasieński expelled from France). Nevertheless, I Burn Paris is less blueprint than a very dark twist on reaching the conditions allowing for an ideal(ized) society. It should be emphasized that I Burn Paris is not a programmatic novel. Yes, there's a message here, and an ideology on offer, but Jasieński's expressionistic instincts take over for wonderful long stretches: he's good at setting his scenes and describing the tumult of the times; he's especially good at crowds and teeming masses. A slight problem with the novel is how characters come to the fore and then disappear -- as is the case with characters such as, in turn, Pierre, P'an Tsiang-kuei, and David Lingslay (and how odd, then, in the book's closing pages, to stumble across Jeanette and Pierre again ...); hence, there is no individual whose fate engages readers from the book's beginning to its end. A collection of vivid stories and well-developed fates, as well as a much broader take on the politics and social inequality of the time, I Burn Paris doesn't quite come together as a novel. Still, it's an unusual and often fascinating document of the times, by a talented writer. - M.A.Orthofer, 25 April 2012 - Return to top of the page - I Burn Paris:
- Return to top of the page - Polish author Bruno Jasieński lived 1901 to 1938, emigrating first to France and then, after he was deported, the Soviet Union. - Return to top of the page -
© 2012-2022 the complete review
|