A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Revolt of the Masscult general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B- : not entirely convincing examination of culture in the contemporary world See our review for fuller assessment.
- Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Chris Lehmann's book considers what has become of the idea of "mass culture", and looks at how culture (popular and otherwise) is consumed, considered, and judged nowadays.
He is not pleased by what he sees.
critical distinctions within the study of culture -- those outmoded judgments that rate, rank, and qualify content, quality and intended audience for cultural production.This seems, at the very least, debatable -- but he has something of a point when he considers such recent events as Jonathan Franzen's clash with a market-anointed arbiter of culture (Oprah Winfrey and her Book Club; see also our article on A Book, an Author, and a Talk Show Host: Some Notes on the Oprah-Franzen Debacle). For Lehmann, that incident (and all its components) reinforces his certainty about "the premiere rule of engagement in contemporary cultural warfare: The market is always right" -- though we weren't entirely convinced by how he made his argument. Lehmann also looks back on the transformation of mass/pop-culture theorizing, especially the Frankfurt school and its critics. Edward Shils, Herbert Gans, Clement Greenberg, and Dwight Macdonald, among others, are discussed -- cleverly, somewhat usefully. Interesting too is the discussion of Robert Warshow, and the twisted interpretations (so Lehmann) of his work by a number of contemporary writers. Eventually he circles back to Oprah and Franzen, and the resulting fallout. Fun facts and fun quotes: but again it doesn't add up to an entirely coherent argument (in no small part because the supporting evidence presented is selective). Lehmann has a sharp tone and enlists some interesting facts, but it's a quick, compact polemic, and though receptive to aspects of what he seems to be after we found the jumpy argument neither entirely cogent nor -- as made -- compelling. Possibly Lehmann's argument and approach require greater familiarity with those he argues for and against -- and the language in which those debates take place: a fair amount of Lehmann's jargon was largely indecipherable to us. In his conclusion, for example he writes about: the great masscult absorption of all prior structures of feeling -- the eclipse of the avant garde, the empty politicization of aesthetic postures and the obsolescence of any and all publicly aired criteria of taste.We can parse some of this -- though as to the meaning of notions such as "structures of feeling" (and it's "absorption") and "aesthetic postures" (and its "politicization"), we can only hazard guesses -- but even allowing for the language such sentences seem to raise more questions than they are worth. Isn't it in the very nature of any avant-garde to be eclipsed ? Can one really say "any and all publicly aired criteria of taste" has become obsolete ? And is the politicization of those darn aesthetic postures (whatever that might mean) really empty ? (Note, of course, that there may be readers who are more receptive to arguments phrased in such ways. If the above quote appears to you to be a sensible statement, then you'll likely get far more out of Lehmann's book than we did.) Revolt of the Masscult is of some interest, with enough clear parts -- regarding some popular cultural phenomena, as well as the history of masscult theorizing -- that are worthwhile, but as a whole isn't nearly as clear (or focussed) enough. - Return to top of the page - Revolt of the Masscult:
- Return to top of the page - Chris Lehmann is an editor at The Washington Post Book World. - Return to top of the page -
© 2003-2010 the complete review
|