A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site buy us books ! Amazon wishlist |
Wellsprings general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : interesting, thoughtful See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
There's no separate introduction to the pieces collected in Wellsprings, but the title certainly suggests what Vargas Llosa offers here.
These seven lectures and essays largely focus on writers and thinkers who have influenced his own thought and writing -- as he has, in part, already acknowledged and discussed in other works of non-fiction (sometimes with exactly the same words ...).
I am quite aware of how ephemeral literary assessments can be, but in Borges' case we can quite justifiably state that he is the most important thing to happen to imaginative writing in the Spanish language in modern times, and one of the most memorable artists of our age.Again, he manages to succinctly convey a great deal about the author, noting, for example, that: What is revolutionary about Borges' prose is that it contains almost as many ideas as words, for his precision and concision are absolute.Vargas Llosa takes Ortega y Gasset to be an underappreciated and far less well-known thinker, and in the lecture about him tries to build a case for why he should be read now. It's a more difficult case to make, but again Vargas Llosa's enthusiasm (and arguments) at least suggest there's something to that. 'The Challenge of Nationalism' and 'Fiction and Reality in Latin America' deal even more obviously with politics. The first focusses specifically on nationalism in Spain, as Vargas Llosa seems particularly annoyed by the secessionist talk of Basques, Catalans, and others. It is the weakest essay in the bunch, and far from convincing. While addressing some of the problems of nationalism, his case against the splintering off of regions, in Spain and elsewhere, sounds almost desperate. To argue that the Slovaks erred badly in splitting off from Czechoslovakia, because it led to: "an increasingly mediocre society governed by a corrupt, authoritarian pseudo-democracy headed by the nationalist Vladimir Meciar" may be accurate in the short term, but it seems entirely premature to condemn the independent Slovakian experiment (and, in fact, conditions seem to have removed markedly over the past few years). And while he's right that "the explosion of nationalism that destroyed Yugoslavia" came at an enormous cost, surely he must recognise that any sort of continuing Yugoslav federation -- just like any continuing Soviet federation -- was simply untenable. The last two essays again focus on individual thinkers, Isaiah Berlin and Karl Popper, and again serve as good overviews, suggesting their contemporary relevance. While he begins his Popper-essay with an extreme formulation -- "Truth, for Karl Popper, is not discovered: it is invented" -- Vargas Llosa explains himself (and Popper) well enough to make clear why he sees this emphasis on falsifiability and a refusal to believe in absolutes so valuable. He nicely sums it up: Popper's theory of knowledge is the best philosophical justification for the ethical value that most characterizes democratic culture: tolerance. if there are no absolute and eternal truths, if the only way for knowledge to progress is by making and correcting mistakes, we should all recognize that our own truths may not be right and that what looks to us like our adversaries' errors may in fact be correct.And he makes other interesting and revealing observations, including: Popper's concept of written history resembles, exactly, what I have always believed the novel to be: an arbitrary organization of human reality that protects humankind against the anguish produced by our intuition of the world, of life, as a vast disorder.Vargas Llosa presents his arguments and beliefs very well, especially when writing about broader and abstract concepts -- ideals like freedom and democracy. He's least successful when he considers specific contemporary political situations, but there's only a bit of that here, and elsewhere he is far more convincing. His enthusiasm is also particularly winning, whether he's writing about certain works of literature, a teacher, or an idea or ideal, and this passion helps make for an engaging little collection. - Return to top of the page - Wellsprings:
- Return to top of the page - Peruvian author Mario Vargas Llosa was born in 1936 and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2010. He has written many works of fiction and non-fiction, and has run for the Presidency of Peru. - Return to top of the page -
© 2008-2018 the complete review
|