A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Palace of Flies general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : neatly wrought portrait of the artist and the times See our review for fuller assessment.
Review Consensus: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Palace of Flies is set in August, 1924, and focuses on then-fifty-year-old Hugo von Hofmannsthal, who has come to the small Austrian summer resort of Bad Fusch in the hopes of getting some work done.
He has come alone to Bad Fusch, determined to concentrate on his work, and yet it all feels like little more than an impasse.
Bad Fusch represents something of a crossroads, with Hofmannsthal constantly questioning whether it is the right place and situation for him at this time.
He repeatedly looks towards the immediate past and future, wondering whether he might not have been better off staying in Lenzerheide, in Switzerland, where he had been visiting his friend, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, thinking: "Perhaps I would have been able, after Carl's departure, to get some work done" there, while he's also pulled ahead to Aussee, imagining joining his family there sooner rather than, as planned, later, even as he knows: "from experience that nothing would change if I did", the busy-ness there certain to keep him from his work.
Rather than a place of release -- away from it all, where he can finally get down to work -- Bad Fusch becomes a frustrating limbo; it even seems Hofmannsthal has reached a sort of end of the line.
He had wished for an undisturbed stay in Fusch, and -- so far, at least -- his wish had been fulfilled; at the same time, he had the impression that he had never before been so alone anywhere in the world.Hofmannsthal is someone who needs that human connection; so too, typically: "made-up conversations and letters were really one of his favorite genres". He is both a dutiful and avid correspondent, and he at least makes one connection in Bad Fusch, someone he can talk to: right at the outset we learn that: "the best thing here in Fusch had in fact been his acquaintance with Doctor Krakauer" -- a man who is now there as the private physician of a rather demanding baroness. Krakauer had studied in New York, in part to avoid the war, and tells Hofmannsthal that: "When I returned after the war, I had trouble getting my bearings. Suddenly everything seemed so lifeless and diffuse, even vicious" -- leading Hofmannsthal to lend him a story he had written years earlier, The Letters of the Man Who Returned. They later discuss it a bit; it is one of several of Hofmannsthal's works that clearly influences Kappacher's novel. So also Hofmannsthal comes to reflect on the path he's taken (and remains on), and one of his most famous stories: What guides us out of the labyrinth, he thought, is language. Everything, he had realized in his younger years, was dependent on us constantly rethinking the true meaning of our words. Perhaps it would be a boon, in inauspicious times like these, when language is degraded to mere convention, to be silent for a while, much like I have tried to demonstrate in my Lord Chandos letter. All my friends, and I myself, for a long time did not understand that I anticipated my own future with this letter. But I, unlike Lord Chandos, have failed, have been unwilling to bear the consequences, the abandonment of all literary activity ...Kappacher determinedly situates Hofmannsthal in this specific time and culture, with Palace of Flies chock full of references and allusions not only to Hofmannsthal's own life and work but to may others' as well. At times the density of reference is almost comic, as in a scene where Hofmannsthal wonders: How the blazes had he come to write to Alma Mahler the previous night ? He crumpled up the two pieces of paper that had been weighted down by the Henry James book, and also the note from Alfred Kubin, the hand-copied, almost illegible chain letter. That Kubin, what a lunatic.From hoping that his wife sent him the copy of Marcel Schwob's Imaginary Lives he had asked for ("These whimsical, very poetic, partly fictional ancient biographies, he thought, might make it easier for him to find his way into the era of Timon") to registering the death of Joseph Conrad (and noting also Kafka's recent death) and reading Henry James, there's some engagement with the broader literary world, but much more with the one closer to him, the German and Austrian circles he doesn't very comfortably fit in. The novel is full of mentions of avoidance and awkward encounters; among the things that seems to weigh on him is an ongoing dispute he has with old friend Rudolf Borchardt. Hofmannsthal is aware of some of his writing weaknesses -- as critics have long noted, he acknowledges -- as, for example: (W)hen he sat over his writing case, he could not manage to set down a taut, convincing dramatic structure. These characters seemed to him mere templates who couldn't come alive for any true communion in the scenes.There's his personality, too, with Kappacher including the well-known anecdote of Robert Walser approaching Hofmannsthal at a reception at the home of publisher Samuel Fischer and exclaiming: "Can't you ever forget that you are famous ?" But his peculiar kind of fame is also defining; Steinberg describes him as having been: "a matinée idol among the literati of the imperial capital in the 1890s", and like an aged movie he hasn't fully managed the transition to a very different era. Hofmannsthal is self-aware enough to have a sense of the problem, and he recognizes that it holds him back -- but he can't reïmagine himself either. One of the things that Kappacher is getting at is how much Hofmannsthal gets in his own way. So much of Palace of Flies is personal reflection and questioning -- yet for all that Hofmannsthal also has to admit: "never could I write a book about myself ...". His most successful literary works are the imagined dialogues and letters he wrote -- a continuation of sorts of what he was, in actual life, best at as well. In his fiction and drama his characters remain dustily dry; typically, too, his one attempt at a novel, Andreas -- which he is also at work on during this time -- remained unfinished. Hofmannsthal could conceive the Lord Chandos-letter, but could not imagine following the same path. So also, his thoughts here frequently turn to a friend from his youth, Leopold von Andrian, who had also published a highly-regarded and influential work when still very young, Der Garten der Erkenntnis, but then turned away from his poetic nature. Andrian's transformation -- including fervently turning to Catholicism, as well as marrying (after a clearly homosexually-inclined youth) -- puzzles Hofmannsthal repeatedly here. (He's pleased that Andrian: "had finally found someone, a wife" but can't help but see her face as: "completely heartless, cold".) Hofmannsthal continues to write, and try to write, but feels little sense of accomplishment -- and not just because so much remains fragmentary and unfinished. At one point he: recalled the difficult years before and after his marriage. I entered life, he had once thought, years later, and my poetic abilities exited through the other door.It's something he continues to struggle with,. He imagines withdrawal, from life at large, -- such as here, in out of the way Bad Fusch -- might lead him back to being creative in the way he longs for, but he isn't really capable of that kind of complete withdrawal any longer. Even as avoidance -- especially of human contact -- has become almost instinctual, he himself recognizes the futility of it -- a motion he goes through, without really meaning it --, and he can't help but to seek out human contact and exchange, clearly also missing family and friends much of this time. Kappacher even closes the story with Hofmannsthal pulling his head back from the window after hearing a woman call out (though not to him): He quickly retreated. How stupid of me, he thought. It was nothing.Palace of Flies is an impressive character-portrait, steeped in the culture and conditions of the time. Very little actually happens, the 'action', as it were, largely limited to Hofmannsthal being annoyed at his inability to get any work done and puttering about -- going on walks, going through his daily routines -- with the occasional short conversations with Dr.Krakauer. Hofmannsthal doesn't really get anywhere, neither with his work nor physically -- but in this going in what amount to circles (and reflecting on the past) we get a good sense of the artist at this point in his life. Kappacher relies heavily on reference -- much of it literary -- for context; Steinberg's Introduction is useful in this regard in giving some sense of many of the figures that are mentioned, though Kappacher clearly assumes a greater familiarity with them and their work. Still, enough here is in the broad brushstrokes that don't demand that greater familiarity -- though certainly more of the novel's detail-work can be more greatly appreciated if one has it. Though a fairly slim novel, Palace of Flies does also range wide -- down to a mention of Peter Altenberg's warning that: "this artist Hitler would one day be talked about far and wide" (with Hofmannsthal reading about Hitler's reduced penal sentence in the newspaper -- and learning: "So, now he's writing a book", while Hofmannsthal struggles with completing any of his projects ...). While very much a portrait of Hofmannsthal, it also gives a good sense of those times and conditions more generally. Hofmannsthal's inability to continue with his creative work boils down to much more than just being in the wrong place; he might not be able to get much of anything done in Bad Fusch, but it's hard to imagine he'd manage any better anywhere else. The problem is more fundamental -- and Kappacher captures and conveys this very well in this impressive little artist-novel. Note that this translation was awarded the ACFNY Translation Prize, 2020/1, and I was on the jury that awarded translator Georg Bauer the prize. The translation certainly does justice to Kappacher's original, and captures the Hofmannsthalesque qualities of the narrative, making it a very worthy introduction to both author and subject for English-speaking readers unfamiliar with one or both. - M.A.Orthofer, 20 April 2022 - Return to top of the page - Palace of Flies:
- Return to top of the page - Austrian author Walter Kappacher was born in 1938. - Return to top of the page -
© 2022 the complete review
|