A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
Monsieur Pain general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B+ : fine and assured small novel See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review:
Written in 1981 or 1982, with a "haphazard and erratic" fate (and publishing history) after that (as Bolaño mentions in a Preliminary Note added to a later edition, included here), Monsieur Pain is, down the to very last lines of the novel proper, impossible to dissociate from the Bolaño-myth and -mania that has since risen around the author, and from his later works, which most readers who pick it up are likely to already be familiar with.
"Aragon ?" I murmur.The poet's fate described here is much like Bolaño's would be, two decades after he wrote this: a death in relative obscurity, though with the writer's genius already recognized by some, and then posthumous fame. Blockman's glance at his watch -- a brilliant last image, a reminder that, for most, poetry and artistic renown are matters that are only of limited interest -- is the closing scene of Pain's account, but the novel also has an: 'Epilogue for Voices: The Elephant Track', brief (one page or so, for the most part) biographical vignettes of the significant characters from the novel, including descriptions of what became of them, and when they died, a precursor of what Bolaño does in works from Nazi Literature in the Americas to The Savage Detectives. So: much of Monsieur Pain seems familiar, and so Bolañoesque -- a shame, almost, because it is now difficult to read the work without fitting it in, as an apprentice-piece, in Bolaño's œuvre as a whole, while, in fact, it is an interesting and appealing work even without all this unavoidable baggage. Pierre Pain is in his forties. He fought in the Great War and was gassed, barely surviving. Returning to civilian life, he lived off his invalid's pension: I gave up everything that could be considered beneficial to a young man's career, and took up the occult sciences, which is to say that I let myself sink into poverty, in a manner that was deliberate, rigorous and not altogether devoid of elegance. At some point during that phase in my life I read An Abridged History of Animal Magnetism, by Franz Mesmer, and, within a matter of weeks, became a mesmerist.He acknowledges: "I am a utopian, in fact, but a static utopian", and: For me, mesmerism is like a medieval painting. Beautiful and useless. Timeless. Trapped.Nevertheless, he continues to practice his art -- or deception -- though, at best, half-heartedly. Madame Reynaud, a widow who is one of his few friends (and in whom he takes some romantic interest), asks him to come to the aid of one of her friends, the wife of the poet César Vallejo. Pain had been unable to save Madame Reynaud's husband when he was on his deathbed, but Vallejo has been in hospital for over a week and is apparently dying and in their desperation they turn even to Pain: "No one knows why; it's no joke. You have to save his life."The doctors aren't helpful -- "All his organs are in perfect working order ! I can't see what's wrong with the man", one complains -- but beyond whatever ails him he has now also come down with the hiccups. Pain eventually finds: Vallejo's hiccups, however, seemed to be quite autonomous, foreign to his body, as if they were afflicted with him rather than the other way around.The situation is complicated by those that seem to take an interest in seeing to it that Vallejo is not helped; Pain is even bribed to stay away from him -- "for the common good". Eventually, Pain shares his fears -- in a telephone call, typically well choreographed by Bolaño: "Forgive me ... I think Vallejo ... my patient ... is going to be assassinated ... Don't ask me how I know ... I don't have any rational explanation ..."Pain remains largely uncomprehending. He is often confused, or feels or even gets lost (as he does when he sneaks back into the hospital). Reality and surreality merge -- marvelously in one scene in a cinema, into which he follows someone, only to find more than he bargained for, both on screen and in the audience. Typically, also, he only finds out about Vallejo's death after the poet has already been buried. Early on he already complains: I was going to object that I didn't understand a word of this gibberish, but on second thought I felt that it would be best to remain silent.He is not solely a passive observer, but his actions are largely fruitless; his reality seems to move separately from the world around him -- down to his would-be love-interest, Madame Reynaud, engaged to another before he even realizes it. He remains: "Timeless. Trapped." Where Pain differs most from the characters in Bolaño's later books is that he lacks the poetic sense Bolaño imbues them with. His fundamental flaw is repeatedly made obvious: "I have very little to lose, really," I said, excusing myself. "You can't even imagine how little."Monsieur Pain is, in many ways, a more conventional novel than most of Bolaño's work, kept down to earth by a protagonist who is unable to make those leaps of the imagination (and live by them) that his later characters will. Amusingly, however, Bolaño can't quite contain himself, and slips in other characters who are more inspired. Among the most appealing in Monsieur Pain are two brothers who build miniature tableaux in fish-tanks -- without great success: "We manage to sell one from time to time, mainly around Christmas, but the buyers have ideas of their own and we only do underwater cemeteries". Here, too, there are more shades of the later, more ambitious Bolaño, as he has one of the brothers sum up the political situation and circumstances (the story is set, after all, in the spring of 1938): There's no future here for two young men like us. We're not partial to the Surrealists or to men in uniform. And sooner or later one camp or the other is bound to throw down the gauntlet. Sooner, the way things are going.Pain is not an artist, and barely a fraud; hence, there's only so much Bolaño can do with him (and, not surprisingly, the epilogue reveals that he neither achieves much nor survives much longer after the events he described). Yet he's an interesting character in his inability to deal with the rich world around him. Sinister forces seem to be at play -- and there are numerous scenes of characters following one another (tellingly generally with the one being followed aware of the other's presence) -- and Bolaño's use of real-life incidents (Vallejo's demise, the nearby Spanish Civil War, the Curie-family) make for an appealing nightmarish journey for the overwhelmed narrator. Despite his admissions that he fails to comprehend so much, Pain too has moments of surprising -- and poetic -- perception; it's a testament to Bolaño's art that these barely jar -- so, for example: The weather could not have been worse; the rain was intensifying, and above the fossilized buildings, which were enveloped in a murmur that struck me, paradoxically, as similar to a nursery rhyme, a leaden sky reared, with milky patches molded by the shifty wind into lung-like shapes, forms that seemed able to breathe in and out, suspended over our heads.Yes, it is difficult to read Monsieur Pain without thinking of it in terms of being an apprentice-work, but it is surprisingly assured and can stand on its own merits. It also shows Bolaño's almost off-hand mastery: if imperfect, it still suggests that he could have been capable of almost anything, from conventional thriller to the works that he's most famous for. A good introduction to the author, and fascinating for those familiar with his later work. - M.A.Orthofer, 18 October 2009 - Return to top of the page - Monsieur Pain:
- Return to top of the page - Chilean author Roberto Bolaño lived 1953 to 2003. - Return to top of the page -
© 2009-2021 the complete review
|