A Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
to e-mail us: support the site |
The Hamburg Score general information | review summaries | our review | links | about the author
- Return to top of the page -
Our Assessment:
B : the usual intriguing Shklovskian mix See our review for fuller assessment.
From the Reviews: - Return to top of the page - The complete review's Review: In his short Preface, Viktor Shklovsky explains what the 'Hamburg Score' of the title is. Even back then, show-wrestling matches were fixed, but Shklovsky claims that once a year wrestlers would gather at a Hamburg pub and have it out behind closed doors, too see who was truly the best, when they fought the way you were actually meant to fight, not choreographed. Shklovsky maintains: "We need a Hamburg score in literature" -- and suggests: In Hamburg, Bulgakov is down on the mat.Like many of Shklovsky's books, The Hamburg Score can feel like a grab-bag. The book is, in many ways, a product of its times, and for Shklovsky the 1920s were a time when: "No one needs thick novels or epic canvases now". The assortment of short pieces ranges from the analytical and exhortative to personal reminiscences -- but is very much a mix of pieces. As he explains (and warns): The idea of the cohesion of a literary work is replaced with the sensation of the value of a separate piece. I am more interested in the contradictions than in the cohesion of the pieces.Shklovsky writes from a personal perspective -- his opinions, his experiences -- as almost everything is written in the first person. Yet he argues I do not feel guilty for always writing in the first person, especially when it is obvious from what I have just written that, while I write in first person, I don't write about myself.Shklovsky's focus is largely on literature and cinema, both of which he was involved in. The early Soviet period was a fertile time of experimentation, and Shklovsy weighs in on many of the major creative actors of the times and their work, from the films of Eisenstein to lesser-known authors or institutions such as the Factory of the Eccentric Actor (where he notes with regret: "We can't have Eccentricism yet"). Shklovsky is succinct, and a sharp observer. He has read incredibly widely and writes comfortably about authors across the political spectrums -- and captures a great deal in single sentences or a mere paragraph, as when he summarizes: Bunin's entire work is italicized. The descriptions are derived not from objects but from other descriptions. The landscape, in general, is a literary concept. It appeared and is experienced through tradition.The work bubbles over with clever observations and thoughts, though Shklovsky remains constantly in motion, rarely sticking to one idea or issue. He writes at greater length on Isaac Babel -- but begins with the nice idea that: One should respect a writer's success and give a reader time to like an author without yet finding out about his success.He writes about how, despite much fine film-making: "Soviet comedy is unsuccessful" (the biggest hurdle being that all the committees it must pass through for approval). He suggests: "We need dictionaries of concepts, not dictionaries of words". And he helpfully reminds us that: If facts are destroying the theory, then that's best for the theory.The Hamburg Score offers a glimpse of a fascinating mind at work. It can feel unfocussed, and too far-ranging, but there's a great deal that is of interest here, and much that still applies beyond the times and circumstances he was writing from. Much is theoretical, but he grounds most of it in the more tangible, and while many of the references are likely to be unknown to contemporary readers, the general sense comes across. Invigorating if occasionally frustrating reading, The Hamburg Score is still well worth the effort. - M.A.Orthofer, 27 January 2017 - Return to top of the page - The Hamburg Score:
- Return to top of the page - Viktor Shklovsky (Виктор Борисович Шкловский, Victor Chklovski, Viktor Sklovskij) (1893-1984) was a leading Russian Formalist. - Return to top of the page -
© 2017 the complete review
|